1 Chinneck, J.W., Dravnieks, E.W., “Locating minimal in-feasible constraint sets in linear programs”, ORSA J. Comput., 3(2), 157—168(1991). 2 Greenberg, H.J., Murphy, F.H., “Approaches to diagnos-ing infeasible linear programs”, ORSA J. Comput., 3(3), 253—261(1991). 3 Tamiz, M., Mardle, S.J., Jones, D.F., “Detecting IIS in infeasible linear programmes using techniques from goal programming”, Comput. Oper. Res., 23(2), 113—119(1996). 4 Roodman, G.M., “Post-infeasibility analysis in linear programming”., Manag. Sci., 25(9), 916—922(1979). 5 Greenberg, H.J., A functional description of analyze: A computer-assisted analysis system for linear program-ming models”, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 9(1), 18—56(1983). 6 Greenberg, H.J., “Diagnosing infeasibility for min-cost network flow models, Part I: Dual infeasibility”. IMA J. Math. Manag., 1, 99—109(1987). 7 Greenberg, H.J., “Computer-assisted analysis for diag-nosing infeasible or unbounded linear programs”. Math. Program. Stud., 31, 79—97(1987). 8 Greenberg, H.J., “Analyze: A computer-assisted analysis system for linear programming models”. Oper. Res. Lett., 6(5), 249—255(1987). 9 Greenberg, H.J., “Diagnosing infeasibility for min-cost network flow models, Part II: Primal infeasibility”. IMA J. Math. Appl. Business Ind., 2, 1—12(1988). 10 Murty, K.G., Linear Programming, New York (1983). 11 Murty, K.G., Kabadi, S.N., Chandrasekaran, R., “Infeasi-bility analysis for linear systems”, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 25(1C), 3—18(2000). 12 Van Loon, J., “Irreducibly inconsistent systems of linear inequalities”, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 8, 283—288(1981). 13 Gleeson, J., Ryan, J., “Identifying minimally infeasible subsystems of inequalities”, ORSA J. Comput., 2(1), 61—63(1990). 14 Leon, T., Liern, V., “A fuzzy method to repair infeasibil-ity in linearly constrained problems”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 122, 237—243(2001). 15 Timminga, E., “Solving infeasibility problems in com-puterized test assembly”, Appl. Psychol. Measur., 22(3), 280—291(1998). 16 Huitzing, H.A., “Using set covering with item sampling to analyze the infeasibility of linear programming test assembly models”, Appl. Psychol. Measur., 28(5), 355—375(2004).
|