Kinetic studies on extra heavy crude oil upgrading using nanocatalysts by applying CFD techniques

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2017.07.001

Abstract

Abstract: Regarding the growth of global energy consumption and the paucity of light crude oil, extracting and using heavy and extra heavy crude oil has received much more attention, but the application of this kind of oil is complicated due to its very high molecular weight. High viscosity and low flowability complicate the transportation of heavy and extra heavy crude oil. Accordingly, it is essential to reduce the viscosity of heavy and extra heavy crude oil through in-situ operations or immediate actions after extraction to reduce costs. Numerical simulations are influential methods, because they reduce calculation time and costs. In this study, the cracking of extra heavy crude oil using computational fluid dynamics is simulated, and a unique kinetic model is proposed based on experimental procedures to predict the behavior of extra heavy crude oil cracking reaction. Moreover, the hydrodynamics and heat transfer of the system and influence of nanocatalysts and temperature on the upgrading of crude oil are studied. The geometry of a reactor is produced using commercial software, and some experiments are performed to examine the validity and accuracy of the numerical results. The findings reveal that there is a good agreement between the numerical and experimental results. Furthermore, to investigate the main factors affecting the process, sensitivity analysis is adopted. Results show that type of catalyst and concentration of catalyst are the parameters that influence the viscosity reduction of extra heavy crude oil the most. The findings further revealed that when using a 25 nm SiO₂ nanocatalyst, a maximum viscosity reduction of 98.67% is observed at 623 K. Also, a catalyst concentration of 2.28wt% is best for upgrading extra heavy crude oil. The results obtained through sensitivity analysis, simulation model, and experiments represent effectual information for the design and development of high performance upgrading processes for energy applications.

Key words: Upgrading, Extra heavy oil, Simulation, Nanocatalyst

摘要： Regarding the growth of global energy consumption and the paucity of light crude oil, extracting and using heavy and extra heavy crude oil has received much more attention, but the application of this kind of oil is complicated due to its very high molecular weight. High viscosity and low flowability complicate the transportation of heavy and extra heavy crude oil. Accordingly, it is essential to reduce the viscosity of heavy and extra heavy crude oil through in-situ operations or immediate actions after extraction to reduce costs. Numerical simulations are influential methods, because they reduce calculation time and costs. In this study, the cracking of extra heavy crude oil using computational fluid dynamics is simulated, and a unique kinetic model is proposed based on experimental procedures to predict the behavior of extra heavy crude oil cracking reaction. Moreover, the hydrodynamics and heat transfer of the system and influence of nanocatalysts and temperature on the upgrading of crude oil are studied. The geometry of a reactor is produced using commercial software, and some experiments are performed to examine the validity and accuracy of the numerical results. The findings reveal that there is a good agreement between the numerical and experimental results. Furthermore, to investigate the main factors affecting the process, sensitivity analysis is adopted. Results show that type of catalyst and concentration of catalyst are the parameters that influence the viscosity reduction of extra heavy crude oil the most. The findings further revealed that when using a 25 nm SiO₂ nanocatalyst, a maximum viscosity reduction of 98.67% is observed at 623 K. Also, a catalyst concentration of 2.28wt% is best for upgrading extra heavy crude oil. The results obtained through sensitivity analysis, simulation model, and experiments represent effectual information for the design and development of high performance upgrading processes for energy applications.

关键词: Upgrading, Extra heavy oil, Simulation, Nanocatalyst

Javad Aminian Dehkordi, Arezou Jafari, Seyyed Amir Sabet, Fatemeh Karami. Kinetic studies on extra heavy crude oil upgrading using nanocatalysts by applying CFD techniques[J]. Chin.J.Chem.Eng., 2018, 26(2): 343-355.

References

[1] Oil Market Report, International Energy Agency, 2010.

[2] H. Alboudwarej, J. Felix, S. Taylor, R. Badry, C. Bremner, B. Brough, C. Skeates, A. Baker, D. Palmer, K. Pattison, Highlighting heavy oil, Oilfield Rev. 18(2) (2006) 34-53.

[3] S. Sadrameli, Thermal/catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons for the production of olefins:A state-of-the-art review I:Thermal cracking review, Fuel 140(2015) 102-115.

[4] R. Ren, H. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Li, Y. Chen, Improving the Aquathermolysis Efficiency of Aromatics in Extra-Heavy Oil by Introducing Hydrogen-Donating Ligands to Catalysts, Energy Fuel 29(12) (2015) 7793-7799.

[5] X. Meng, C. Xu, J. Gao, L. Li, Studies on catalytic pyrolysis of heavy oils:Reaction behaviors and mechanistic pathways, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 294(2) (2005) 168-176.

[6] J.-H. Lin, V.V. Guliants, Alumina-supported Cu-Ni and Ni-Cu core-shell nanoparticles:Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic activity in water-gas-shift reaction, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 445(2012) 187-194.

[7] K. Li, B. Hou, L. Wang, Y. Cui, Application of carbon nanocatalysts in upgrading heavy crude oil assisted with microwave heating, Nano Lett. 14(6) (2014) 3002-3008.

[8] E.E. Johnsen, H.P. Ronningsen, Viscosity of ‘live’ water-in-crude-oil emulsions:experimental work and validation of correlations, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 38(1) (2003) 23-36.

[9] J. Sjöblom, N. Aske, I.H. Auflem, O. Brandal, T.E. Havre, O. Saether, A. Westvik, E.E. Johnsen, H. Kallevik, Our current understanding of water-in-crude oil emulsions.:Recent characterization techniques and high pressure performance, Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 100(2003) 399-473.

[10] P.M. Rahimi, T. Gentzis, The chemistry of bitumen and heavy oil processing, Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing, Springer 2006, pp. 597-634.

[11] S.V. Nayak, S.L. Joshi, V.V. Ranade, Modeling of vaporization and cracking of liquid oil injected in a gas-solid riser, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60(22) (2005) 6049-6066.

[12] J. Chang, F. Meng, L. Wang, K. Zhang, H. Chen, Y. Yang, CFD investigation of hydrodynamics, heat transfer and cracking reaction in a heavy oil riser with bottom airlift loop mixer, Chem. Eng. Sci. 78(2012) 128-143.

[13] Y. Behjat, S. Shahhosseini, M.A. Marvast, CFD analysis of hydrodynamic, heat transfer and reaction of three phase riser reactor, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89(7) (2011) 978-989.

[14] S.A. Sabet, Effects of microwaves radiation and nanocatalysts ion viscosity reduction of extra heavy crude oil, Department of chemical engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, 2015.

[15] Y.H. Shokrlu, T. Babadagli, Viscosity reduction of heavy oil/bitumen using micro-and nano-metal particles during aqueous and non-aqueous thermal applications, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 119(2014) 210-220.

[16] B. Gong, Methodology for technology evaluation under uncertainty and its application in advanced coal gasification processes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011.

[17] H.C. Frey, E.S. Rubin, Evaluation of advanced coal gasification combined-cycle systems under uncertainty, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 31(5) (1992) 1299-1307.

[18] I. Pan, D.S. Pandey, Incorporating uncertainty in data driven regression models of fluidized bed gasification:A Bayesian approach, Fuel Process. Technol. 142(2016) 305-314.

[19] A. Kraslawski, Review of applications of various types of uncertainty in chemical engineering, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 26(3) (1989) 185-191.

[20] J.P. Holman, W.J. Gajda, Experimental methods for engineers, 7, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.

[21] R. Gharibshahi, A. Jafari, A. Haghtalab, M.S. Karambeigi, Application of CFD to evaluate the pore morphology effect on nanofluid flooding for enhanced oil recovery, RSC Adv. 5(37) (2015) 28938-28949.

[22] A. Jafari, T. Tynjala, S.M. Mousavi, P. Sarkomaa, CFD simulation and evaluation of controllable parameters effect on thermomagnetic convection in ferrofluids using Taguchi technique, Comput. Fluids 37(10) (2008) 1344-1353.

[23] A. Shahmohammadi, A. Jafari, Application of different CFD multiphase models to investigate effects of baffles and nanoparticles on heat transfer enhancement, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 8(3) (2014) 320-329.

[24] A. Jafari, P. Zamankhan, S.M. Mousavi, K. Pietarinen, Modeling and CFD simulation of flow behavior and dispersivity through randomly packed bed reactors, Chem. Eng. J. 144(3) (2008) 476-482.

[25] J. Buongiorno, Convective transport in nanofluids, J. Heat Transf. 128(3) (2006) 240-250.

[26] M.Z. Saghir, A. Ahadi, T. Yousefi, B. Farahbakhsh, Two-phase and single phase models of flow of nanofluid in a square cavity:Comparison with experimental results, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 100(2016) 372-380.

[27] A. Ochieng, M.S. Onyango, Drag models, solids concentration and velocity distribution in a stirred tank, Powder Technol. 181(1) (2008) 1-8.

[28] H. Azargoshasb, S.M. Mousavi, T. Amani, A. Jafari, M. Nosrati, Three-phase CFD simulation coupled with population balance equations of anaerobic syntrophic acidogenesis and methanogenesis reactions in a continuous stirred bioreactor, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 27(2015) 207-217.

[29] D.C. Wilcox, Turbulence modeling for CFD, 2, DCW industries La Canada, CA, 1998.

[30] A. Brandenburg, P.J. Kapyla, A. Mohammed, Non-Fickian diffusion and tau approximation from numerical turbulence, Phys. Fluids (1994-present) 16(4) (2004) 1020-1027.

[31] L. Rebreanu, J.-P. Vanderborght, L. Chou, The diffusion coefficient of dissolved silica revisited, Mar. Chem. 112(3) (2008) 230-233.

[32] I.M. Head, D.M. Jones, S.R. Larter, Biological activity in the deep subsurface and the origin of heavy oil, Nature 426(6964) (2003) 344-352.

[33] N. Rahimi, R. Karimzadeh, Catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons over modified ZSM-5 zeolites to produce light olefins:A review, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 398(1) (2011) 1-17.

[34] R. Sahu, B.J. Song, J.S. Im, Y.-P. Jeon, C.W. Lee, A review of recent advances in catalytic hydrocracking of heavy residues, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 27(2015) 12-24.

[35] T. Ahmed, Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 3, Gulf Professional Publishing, 2006.

[36] O. Alomair, A. Elsharkawy, H. Alkandari, A viscosity prediction model for Kuwaiti heavy crude oils at elevated temperatures, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 120(2014) 102-110.

[37] A.P. Szilas, Production and Transport of Oil and Gas:Gathering and transportation, Elsevier, 1985.

[38] G. Petrosky Jr., F. Farshad, Viscosity correlations for Gulf of Mexico crude oils, SPE Production Operations Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1995.

[39] R.E. Maples, Petroleum refinery process economics, Pennwell books, 2000.

[40] L.S. Lee, Y.W. Chen, T.N. Huang, W.Y. Pan, Four-lump kinetic model for fluid catalytic cracking process, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 67(4) (1989) 615-619.

[41] Y. Hamedi Shokrlu, T. Babadagli, In-situ upgrading of heavy oil/bitumen during steam injection by use of metal nanoparticles:A study on in-situ catalysis and catalyst transportation, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 16(03) (2013) 333-344.

[42] J.V. Mehrabani, M. Noaparast, S.M. Mousavi, R. Dehghan, A. Ghorbani, Process optimization and modelling of sphalerite flotation from a low-grade Zn-Pb ore using response surface methodology, Sep. Purif. Technol. 72(3) (2010) 242-249.

[43] S.L.C. Ferreira, R.E. Bruns, H.S. Ferreira, G.D. Matos, J.M. David, G.C. Brandao, E.G.P. da Silva, L.A. Portugal, P.S. dos Reis, A.S. Souza, W.N.L. dos Santos, Box-Behnken design:An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods, Anal. Chim. Acta 597(2) (2007) 179-186.

[44] A. Maghzi, S. Mohammadi, M.H. Ghazanfari, R. Kharrat, M. Masihi, Monitoring wettability alteration by silica nanoparticles during water flooding to heavy oils in fivespot systems:A pore-level investigation, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 40(2012) 168-176.

[45] M. Dogru, A. Midilli, C.R. Howarth, Gasification of sewage sludge using a throated downdraft gasifier and uncertainty analysis, Fuel Process. Technol. 75(1) (2002) 55-82.

[46] V.Y. Rudyak, S.L. Krasnolutskii, Dependence of the viscosity of nanofluids on nanoparticle size and material, Phys. Lett. A 378(26-27) (2014) 1845-1849.

[47] J. Aminian Dehkordi, S.S. Hosseini, P.K. Kundu, N.R. Tan, Mathematical modeling of natural gas separation using hollow fiber membrane modules by application of finite element method through statistical analysis, Chem. Prod. Process. Model. 11(1) (2016) 11-15.

[48] S.S. Hosseini, J. Aminian Dehkordi, P.K. Kundu, Gas permeation and separation in asymmetric hollow fiber membrane permeators:Mathematical modeling, sensitivity analysis and optimization, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33(11) (2016) 3085-3101.

[49] S.O. Rastegar, S.M. Mousavi, S.A. Shojaosadati, Bioleaching of an oil-fired residual:process optimization and nanostructure NaV 6 O 15 synthesis from the bioleachate, RSC Adv. 5(51) (2015) 41088-41097.

[50] S. Rastegar, S. Mousavi, M. Rezaei, S. Shojaosadati, Statistical evaluation and optimization of effective parameters in bioleaching of metals from molybdenite concentrate using Acidianus brierleyi, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20(5) (2014) 3096-3101.

[51] M. Ijadi Bajestani, S.M. Mousavi, S.A. Shojaosadati, Bioleaching of heavy metals from spent household batteries using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans:Statistical evaluation and optimization, Sep. Purif. Technol. 132(2014) 309-316.

[52] R. Mafi Gholami, S.M. Mousavi, S.M. Borghei, Process optimization and modeling of heavy metals extraction from a molybdenum rich spent catalyst by aspergillus niger using response surface methodology, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 18(1) (2012) 218-224.

[53] S.M. Mousavi, S. Yaghmaei, A. Jafari, M. Vossoughi, Z. Ghobadi, Optimization of ferrous biooxidation rate in a packed bed bioreactor using Taguchi approach, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 46(10) (2007) 935-940.