CFD simulation of impeller shape effect on quality of mixing in two-phase gas–liquid agitated vessel

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2020.06.036

Abstract

Abstract: Mixing efficiency in two-phase gas-liquid agitated vessel is one of the important challenges in the industrial processes. Computational fluid dynamics technique (CFD) was used to investigate the effect of four different pitched blade impellers, including 15°, 30°, 45° and 60°, on the mixing quality of gas-liquid agitated vessel. The multiphase flow behavior was modeled by Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase approach, and RNG k-ε was used to model the turbulence. The CFD results showed that a strong global vortex plays the main role on the mixing quality of the gas phase in the vessel. Based on the standard deviation criterion, it was observed that the axial distribution of the gas phase in the 30° impeller is about 55% better than the others. In addition, the results showed that the 30° impeller has a uniform radial distribution over the other impellers and the maximum gas phase holdup in the vessel. Investigation of the power consumption of the impellers showed that the 30° impeller has the highest power consumption among the other pitched blade impellers. Also, examine the effect of same power condition for pitched blade impellers showed that the 30° impeller has the best mixing quality in this condition.

Key words: Pitched blade impeller, Mixing, CFD, Multiphase flow, RNG k-ε model

摘要： Mixing efficiency in two-phase gas-liquid agitated vessel is one of the important challenges in the industrial processes. Computational fluid dynamics technique (CFD) was used to investigate the effect of four different pitched blade impellers, including 15°, 30°, 45° and 60°, on the mixing quality of gas-liquid agitated vessel. The multiphase flow behavior was modeled by Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase approach, and RNG k-ε was used to model the turbulence. The CFD results showed that a strong global vortex plays the main role on the mixing quality of the gas phase in the vessel. Based on the standard deviation criterion, it was observed that the axial distribution of the gas phase in the 30° impeller is about 55% better than the others. In addition, the results showed that the 30° impeller has a uniform radial distribution over the other impellers and the maximum gas phase holdup in the vessel. Investigation of the power consumption of the impellers showed that the 30° impeller has the highest power consumption among the other pitched blade impellers. Also, examine the effect of same power condition for pitched blade impellers showed that the 30° impeller has the best mixing quality in this condition.

关键词: Pitched blade impeller, Mixing, CFD, Multiphase flow, RNG k-ε model

Amir Heidari. CFD simulation of impeller shape effect on quality of mixing in two-phase gas–liquid agitated vessel[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 28(11): 2733-2745.

Amir Heidari. CFD simulation of impeller shape effect on quality of mixing in two-phase gas–liquid agitated vessel[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2020, 28(11): 2733-2745.

References

[1] J.B. Joshi, N.K. Nere, C.V. Rane, B.N. Murthy, C.S. Mathpati, A.W. Patwardhan, V.V. Ranade, CFD simulation of stirred tanks:Comparison of turbulence models. Part I:radial flow impellers, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 89(1) (2011) 23-82.
[2] V.V. Ranade, Y. Tayalia, H. Krishnan, CFD predictions of flow near impeller blades in baffled stirred vessels:assessment of computational snapshot approach, Chem. Eng. Commun. 189(7) (2002) 895-922.
[3] A. Ochieng, M.S. Onyango, Drag models, solids concentration and velocity distribution in a stirred tank, Powder Technol. 181(1) (2008) 1-8.
[4] G. Montante, F. Magelli, Mixed solids distribution in stirred vessels:experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46(9) (2007) 2885-2891.
[5] A.R. Khopkar, G.R. Kasat, A.B. Pandit, V.V. Ranade, Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the solid suspension in a stirred slurry reactor, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45(12) (2006) 4416-4428.
[6] M. Ljungqvist, A. Rasmuson, Numerical simulation of the two-phase flow in an axially stirred vessel, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 79(5) (2001) 533-546.
[7] R. Clift, W.H. Gauvin, Motion of entrained particles in gas streams, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 49(4) (1971) 439-448.
[8] A. Bakker, H.E.A. Van den Akker, Single-phase flow in stirred reactors, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 72(A4) (1994) 583-593.
[9] A. Brucato, F. Grisafi, G. Montante, Particle drag coefficients in turbulent fluids, Chem. Eng. Sci. 53(18) (1998) 3295-3314.
[10] D. Pinelli, G. Montante, F. Magelli, Dispersion coefficients and settling velocities of solids in slurry vessels stirred with different types of multiple impellers, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59(15) (2004) 3081-3089.
[11] G.L. Lane, M.P. Schwarz, G.M. Evans, Numerical modelling of gas-liquid flow in stirred tanks, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60(8-9 SPEC. ISS) (2005) 2203-2214.
[12] A.R. Khopkar, V.V. Ranade, CFD simulation of gas-liquid stirred vessel:VC, S33, and L33 flow regimes, AIChE J 52(5) (2006) 1654-1672.
[13] J.B. Joshi, N.K. Nere, C.V. Rane, B.N. Murthy, C.S. Mathpati, A.W. Patwardhan, V.V. Ranade, CFD simulation of stirred tanks:comparison of turbulence models (part Ⅱ:axial flow impellers, multiple impellers and multiphase dispersions), Can. J. Chem. Eng. 89(4) (2011) 754-816.
[14] J.J. Derksen, Long-time solids suspension simulations by means of a large-eddy approach, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 84(1 A) (2006) 38-46.
[15] J.J. Derksen, Numerical simulation of solids suspension in a stirred tank, AIChE J 49(11) (2003) 2700-2714.
[16] F. Sbrizzai, V. Lavezzo, R. Verzicco, M. Campolo, A. Soldati, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent particle dispersion in an unbaffled stirred-tank reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61(9) (2006) 2843-2851.
[17] A.D. Gosman, C. Lekakou, S. Politis, R.I. Issa, M.K. Looney, Multidimensional modeling of turbulent two-phase flows in stirred vessels, AIChE J 38(12) (1992) 1946-1956.
[18] G.L. Lane, M.P. Schwarz, G.M. Evans, Predicting gas-liquid flow in a mechanically stirred tank, Appl. Math. Model. 26(2) (2002) 223-235.
[19] N.G. Deen, T. Solberg, B.H. Hjertager, Flow generated by an aerated Rushton impeller:two-phase PIV experiments and numerical simulations, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 80(4) (2002) 638-652.
[20] A.R. Khopkar, J. Aubin, C. Xuereb, N. Le Sauze, J. Bertrand, V.V. Ranade, Gas-liquid flow generated by a pitched-blade turbine:particle image velocimetry measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42(21) (2003) 5318-5332.
[21] A.R. Khopkar, A.R. Rammohan, V.V. Ranade, M.P. Dudukovic, Gas-liquid flow generated by a Rushton turbine in stirred vessel:CARPT/CT measurements and CFD simulations, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60(8-9) (2005) 2215-2229.
[22] F. Kerdouss, A. Bannari, P. Proulx, CFD modeling of gas dispersion and bubble size in a double turbine stirred tank, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61(10) (2006) 3313-3322.
[23] B.N. Murthy, N.A. Deshmukh, A.W. Patwardhan, J.B. Joshi, Hollow self-inducing impellers:flow visualization and CFD simulation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62(14) (2007) 3839-3848.
[24] F. Scargiali, A. D'Orazio, F. Grisafi, A. Brucato, Modelling and simulation of gas-liquid hydrodynamics in mechanically stirred tanks, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 85(5 A) (2007) 637-646.
[25] G. Montante, D. Horn, A. Paglianti, Gas-liquid flow and bubble size distribution in stirred tanks, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63(8) (2008) 2107-2118.
[26] J. Gimbun, C.D. Rielly, Z.K. Nagy, Modelling of mass transfer in gas-liquid stirred tanks agitated by Rushton turbine and CD-6 impeller:A scale-up study, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87(4) (2009) 437-451.
[27] M. Jahoda, L. Tomášková, M. Moštěk, CFD prediction of liquid homogenisation in a gas-liquid stirred tank, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87(4) (2009) 460-467.
[28] Q. Zhang, Y. Yong, Z.-S. Mao, C. Yang, C. Zhao, Experimental determination and numerical simulation of mixing time in a gas-liquid stirred tank, Chem. Eng. Sci. 64(12) (2009) 2926-2933.
[29] Y.H. Zhang, Y.M. Yong, Z.S. Mao, C. Yang, H.Y. Sun, H.L. Wang, Numerical simulation of gas-liquid flow in a stirred tank with swirl modification, Chem. Eng. Technol. 32(8) (2009) 1266-1273.
[30] Q. Zhang, C. Yang, Z.-S. Mao, J. Mu, Large Eddy simulation of turbulent flow and mixing time in a gas-liquid stirred tank, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(30) (2012) 10124-10131.
[31] M. Petitti, M. Vanni, D.L. Marchisio, A. Buffo, F. Podenzani, Simulation of coalescence, break-up and mass transfer in a gas-liquid stirred tank with CQMOM, Chem. Eng. J. 228(2013) 1182-1194.
[32] Y. Zhang, Y. Bai, H. Wang, CFD analysis of inter-phase forces in a bubble stirred vessel, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91(1) (2013) 29-35.
[33] H. Wang, X. Jia, X. Wang, Z. Zhou, J. Wen, J. Zhang, CFD modeling of hydrodynamic characteristics of a gas-liquid two-phase stirred tank, Appl. Math. Model. 38(1) (2014) 63-92.
[34] Y. Bao, B. Wang, M. Lin, Z. Gao, J. Yang, Influence of impeller diameter on overall gas dispersion properties in a sparged multi-impeller stirred tank, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 23(6) (2015) 890-896.
[35] Y. Bao, J. Yang, B. Wang, Z. Gao, Influence of impeller diameter on local gas dispersion properties in a sparged multi-impeller stirred tank, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 23(4) (2015) 615-622.
[36] N.T.A. Othman, M.P. Ngaliman, CFD simulation of gas-liquid in an agitated vessel, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9(21) (2016) 1-6.
[37] J. Sarkar, L.K. Shekhawat, V. Loomba, A.S. Rathore, CFD of mixing of multi-phase flow in a bioreactor using population balance model, Biotechnol. Prog. 32(3) (2016) 613-628.
[38] P. Shi, R. Rzehak, Bubbly flow in stirred tanks:Euler-Euler/RANS modeling, Chem. Eng. Sci. 190(2018) 419-435.
[39] A. Heidari, CFD simulation of operational parameters effects on mixing quality of twophase gas-liquid flow in agitated vessel, Modares Mechanical Eng. 18(8) (2018) 9-18.
[40] X. Guan, X. Li, N. Yang, M. Liu, CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in stirred tanks:effect of drag models, Chem. Eng. J. 386(2020), 121554..
[41] W.-M. Lu, S.-J. Ju, Local gas holdup, mean liquid velocity and turbulence in an aerated stirred tank using hot-film anemometry, Chem. Eng. J. 35(1) (1987) 9-17.
[42] J.O. Hinze, Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes, AIChE J 1(3) (1955) 289-295.
[43] W. Chtourou, M. Ammar, Z. Driss, M.S. Abid, Effect of the turbulence models on Rushton turbine generated flow in a stirred vessel, Cent. Eur. J. Eng. 1(4) (2011) 380-389.
[44] F. Scargiali, Gas-Liquid Dispersions in Mechanically Agitated Contactors, PhD Thesis, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 2006.
[45] J.-P. Torré, D.F. Fletcher, T. Lasuye, C. Xuereb, An experimental and computational study of the vortex shape in a partially baffled agitated vessel, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62(7) (2007) 1915-1926.
[46] J.-P. Torré, D.F. Fletcher, T. Lasuye, C. Xuereb, Single and multiphase CFD approaches for modelling partially baffled stirred vessels:comparison of experimental data with numerical predictions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62(22) (2007) 6246-6262.
[47] A. Buffo, M. Vanni, D.L. Marchisio, Multidimensional population balance model for the simulation of turbulent gas-liquid systems in stirred tank reactors, Chem. Eng. Sci. 70(2012) 31-44.
[48] V. Yakhot, S.A. Orszag, Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory, J. Sci. Comput. 1(1) (1986) 3-51.
[49] V. Yakhot, L.M. Smith, The renormalization group, the ε-expansion and derivation of turbulence models, J. Sci. Comput. 7(1) (1992) 35-61.
[50] V. Yakhot, S.A. Orszag, S. Thangam, T.B. Gatski, C.G. Speziale, Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique, Phys. Fluids A:Fluid Dynamics 4(7) (1992) 1510-1520.
[51] P.H. Calderbank, Physical rate processes in industrial fermentations part I:The interfacial area in gas-liquid contacting with mechanical agitation, Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs 36(1958) 443-463.