Activating solution gas drive as an extra oil production mechanism after carbonated water injection

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2020.07.026

Abstract

Abstract: Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are mostly based on different phenomena taking place at the interfaces between fluid-fluid and rock-fluid phases. Over the last decade, carbonated water injection (CWI) has been considered as one of the multi-objective EOR techniques to store CO₂ in the hydrocarbon bearing formations as well as improving oil recovery efficiency. During CWI process, as the reservoir pressure declines, the dissolved CO₂ in the oil phase evolves and gas nucleation phenomenon would occur. As a result, it can lead to oil saturation restoration and subsequently, oil displacement due to the hysteresis effect. At this condition, CO₂ would act as insitu dissolved gas into the oil phase, and play the role of an artificial solution gas drive (SGD).
In this study, the effect of SGD as an extra oil recovery mechanism after secondary and tertiary CWI (SCWI-TCWI) modes has been experimentally investigated in carbonate rocks using coreflood tests. The depressurization tests resulted in more than 25% and 18% of original oil in place (OOIP) because of the SGD after SCWI and TCWI tests, respectively. From the ultimate enhanced oil recovery point of view, the efficiency of SGD was observed to be more than one-third of that of CWI itself. Furthermore, the pressure drop data revealed that the system pressure depends more on the oil production pattern than water production.

Key words: Solution gas drive, Gas nucleation, Carbonated water, Enhanced oil recovery, CO₂ capture

摘要： Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are mostly based on different phenomena taking place at the interfaces between fluid-fluid and rock-fluid phases. Over the last decade, carbonated water injection (CWI) has been considered as one of the multi-objective EOR techniques to store CO₂ in the hydrocarbon bearing formations as well as improving oil recovery efficiency. During CWI process, as the reservoir pressure declines, the dissolved CO₂ in the oil phase evolves and gas nucleation phenomenon would occur. As a result, it can lead to oil saturation restoration and subsequently, oil displacement due to the hysteresis effect. At this condition, CO₂ would act as insitu dissolved gas into the oil phase, and play the role of an artificial solution gas drive (SGD).
In this study, the effect of SGD as an extra oil recovery mechanism after secondary and tertiary CWI (SCWI-TCWI) modes has been experimentally investigated in carbonate rocks using coreflood tests. The depressurization tests resulted in more than 25% and 18% of original oil in place (OOIP) because of the SGD after SCWI and TCWI tests, respectively. From the ultimate enhanced oil recovery point of view, the efficiency of SGD was observed to be more than one-third of that of CWI itself. Furthermore, the pressure drop data revealed that the system pressure depends more on the oil production pattern than water production.

关键词: Solution gas drive, Gas nucleation, Carbonated water, Enhanced oil recovery, CO₂ capture

Mahmood Shakiba, Shahab Ayatollahi, Masoud Riazi. Activating solution gas drive as an extra oil production mechanism after carbonated water injection[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 28(11): 2938-2945.

Mahmood Shakiba, Shahab Ayatollahi, Masoud Riazi. Activating solution gas drive as an extra oil production mechanism after carbonated water injection[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2020, 28(11): 2938-2945.

References

[1] A. Bera, A. Mandal, G.B. Guha, Synergistic effect of surfactant and salt mixture on interfacial tension reduction between crude oil and water in enhanced oil recovery, J. Chem. Eng. Data 59(1) (2013) 89-96.
[2] S. Kumar, P. Panigrahi, Kumar Saw, A. Mandal, Interfacial interaction of cationic surfactants and its effect on wettability alteration of oil-wet carbonate rock, Energy Fuel 30(2016) 2846-2857.
[3] N. Kumar, A. Mandal, Surfactant stabilized oil-in-water nanoemulsion:stability, interfacial tension and rheology study for enhanced oil recovery application, Energy Fuel 32(6) (2018) 6452-6466.
[4] M. Riazi, A. Golkari, The influence of spreading coefficient on carbonated water alternating gas injection in a heavy crude oil, Fuel 178(2016) 1-9.
[5] M. Riazi, M.S. Sohrabi, M. Jamiolahmady, S. Ireland, C. Brown, Oil recovery improvement using CO₂-enriched water injection, 71st European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2009, pp. 1915-1925.
[6] L.L. Handy, A laboratory study of oil recovery by solution gas drive, AIME, Transactions 213(1958) 310-315.
[7] L.W. Holm, L.J. O'Brien, Carbon dioxide test at the mead-strawn field, J. Pet. Technol. 23(04) (1971) 431-442.
[8] L.W. Holm, V.A. Josendal, Mechanisms of oil displacement by carbon dioxide, J. Pet. Technol. 26(12) (1974) 1-427.
[9] J.C. Moulu, Solution-gas drive:experiments and simulation, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2(4) (1989) 379-386.
[10] F. RCK Wong, J.S. Guo, W.E. Barr Weaver, Heavy oil flow under solution-gas drive:pressure depletion tests, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 38(1999) 31-37.
[11] R. Kumar, M. Pooladi-Darvish, T. Okazawa, An investigation into enhanced recovery under solution gas drive in heavy oil reservoirs, paper SPE 59336 the SPE/DOE IOR Symposium, Tulsa, 20003-5, https://doi.org/10.2118/59336-MS.
[12] P. Arora, A. Kovscek, Mechanistic modeling of solution-gas drive in viscous oils, J. Pet. Technol. 53(6) (2001) 48-49.
[13] S. Akin, A.R. Kovscek, Heavy-oil solution gas drive:a laboratory study, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 35(1-2) (2002) 33-48.
[14] G.Q. Tang, Y.T. Leung, L.M. Castanier, A. Sahni, F. Gadelle, M. Kumar, A.R. Kovscek, An investigation of the effect of oil composition on heavy oil solution-gas drive, SPE J. 11(01) (2006) 58-70.
[15] A. Sahni, F. Gadelle, M. Kumar, L. Tomutsa, A.R. Kovscek, Experiments and analysis of heavy-oil solution-gas drive, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 7(03) (2004) 217-229.
[16] M. Shahvali, M. Pooladi-Darvish, Dynamic modelling of solution-gas drive in heavy oils, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 48(12) (2009) 39-46.
[17] T. Lu, Z. Li, S. Li, S. Liu, X. Li, P. Wang, Z. Wang, Behaviors of foamy oil flow in solution gas drive at different temperatures, Transp. Porous Media 109(1) (2015) 25-42.
[18] A. Bera, T. Babadagli, Relative permeability of foamy oil for different types of dissolved gases, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 19(04) (2016) 604-619.
[19] T. Lu, Z. Li, S. Li, P. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Liu, Enhanced heavy oil recovery after solution gas drive by water flooding, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 137(2016) 113-124.
[20] X. Zhou, F. Zeng, L. Zhang, H. Wang, Foamy oil flow in heavy oil-solvent systems tested by pressure depletion in a sandpack, Fuel 171(2016) 210-223.
[21] B.S. Abusahmin, R.R. Karri, B.B. Maini, Influence of fluid and operating parameters on the recovery factors and gas oil ratio in high viscous reservoirs under foamy solution gas drive, Fuel 197(2017) 497-517.
[22] W. Dong, X. Wang, J. Wang, A new method to calculate the early performance of solution-gas-drive reservoirs, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171(2018) 153-163.
[23] U. Bagudu, S.R. McDougall, E.J. Mackay, Network modelling analysis of a depressurization experiment on a North Sea reservoir core sample, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 162(2018) 63-75.
[24] Y. Zhang, H. Zhao, X. Sun, S. Zhang, Z. Gai, Y. Liu. Experimental study of foamy oil solution gas drive process in an etched glass micromodel. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science. vol. 223(1)(2019)012035.
[25] Y.B. Chang, B.K. Coats, J.S. Nolen, A compositional model for CO₂ floods including CO₂ solubility in water, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 1(02) (1998) 155-160.
[26] R. Wiebe, The binary system carbon dioxide-water under pressure, Chem. Rev. 29(3) (1941) 475-481.
[27] Z. Duan, R. Sun, An improved model calculating CO₂ solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 K to 533 K and from 0 MPa to 200 MPa, Chem. Geol. 193(3) (2003) 257-271.
[28] Z. Duan, R. Sun, C. Zhu, An improved model for the calculation of CO₂ solubility in aqueous solutions containing Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Cl^-, and SO₄^2-, Mar. Chem. 98(2) (2006) 131-139.
[29] M. Shakiba, S. Ayatollahi, M. Riazi, Investigation of oil recovery and CO₂ storage during secondary and tertiary injection of carbonated water in an Iranian carbonate oil reservoir, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 137(2016) 134-143.
[30] A. Golkari, M. Riazi, Comparative study of oil spreading characteristics for water and carbonated water systems using live and dead oils, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171(2018) 242-252.
[31] M. Riazi, Pore scale mechanisms of carbonated water injection in oil reservoirs, PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK, 2011.
[32] C. Du, Y.C. Yortsos, A numerical study of the critical gas saturation in a porous medium, Transp. Porous Media 35(2) (1999) 205-225.
[33] G.Q. Tang, A. Firoozabadi, Wettability alteration to intermediate gas-wetting in porous media at elevated temperatures, Transp. Porous Media 52(2) (2003) 185-211.
[34] M. Shakiba, M. Riazi, S. Ayatollahi, M. Takband, The impact of connate water saturation and salinity on oil recovery and CO₂ storage capacity during carbonated water injection in carbonate rock, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 27(7) (2019) 1699-1707.