Vacuum residue coking process simulation using molecular-level kinetic model coupled with vapor-liquid phase separation

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2021.10.014

Abstract

Abstract: In this work, a molecular-level kinetic model was built to simulate the vacuum residue (VR) coking process in a semi-batch laboratory-scale reaction kettle. A series of reaction rules for heavy oil coking were summarized and formulated based on the free radical reaction mechanism. Then, a large-scale molecularlevel reaction network was automatically generated by applying the reaction rules on the vacuum residue molecules. In order to accurately describe the physical change of each molecule in the reactor, we coupled the molecular-level kinetic model with a vapor–liquid phase separation model. The vapor–liquid phase separation model adopted the Peng-Robinson equation of state to calculate vapor–liquid equilibrium. A separation efficiency coefficient was introduced to represent the mass transfer during the phase separation. We used six sets of experimental data under various reaction conditions to regress the model parameters. The tuned model showed that there was an excellent agreement between the calculated values and experimental data. Moreover, we investigated the effect of reaction temperature and reaction time on the product yields. After a comprehensive evaluation of the reaction temperature and reaction time, the optimal reaction condition for the vacuum residue coking was also obtained.

Key words: Kinetic modeling, Molecular engineering, Vapor–liquid equilibrium, Vacuum residue coking

摘要： In this work, a molecular-level kinetic model was built to simulate the vacuum residue (VR) coking process in a semi-batch laboratory-scale reaction kettle. A series of reaction rules for heavy oil coking were summarized and formulated based on the free radical reaction mechanism. Then, a large-scale molecularlevel reaction network was automatically generated by applying the reaction rules on the vacuum residue molecules. In order to accurately describe the physical change of each molecule in the reactor, we coupled the molecular-level kinetic model with a vapor–liquid phase separation model. The vapor–liquid phase separation model adopted the Peng-Robinson equation of state to calculate vapor–liquid equilibrium. A separation efficiency coefficient was introduced to represent the mass transfer during the phase separation. We used six sets of experimental data under various reaction conditions to regress the model parameters. The tuned model showed that there was an excellent agreement between the calculated values and experimental data. Moreover, we investigated the effect of reaction temperature and reaction time on the product yields. After a comprehensive evaluation of the reaction temperature and reaction time, the optimal reaction condition for the vacuum residue coking was also obtained.

关键词: Kinetic modeling, Molecular engineering, Vapor–liquid equilibrium, Vacuum residue coking

Zhengyu Chen, Xinhui Yao, Dong Guan, Suoqi Zhao, Linzhou Zhang, Chunming Xu. Vacuum residue coking process simulation using molecular-level kinetic model coupled with vapor-liquid phase separation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, 41(1): 301-310.

References

[1] W. Wei, C.A. Bennett, R. Tanaka, G. Hou, M.T. Klein, Computer aided kinetic modeling with KMT and KME, Fuel Process. Technol. 89(4) (2008) 350–363.
[2] R.J. Quann, S.B. Jaffe, Structure-oriented lumping: Describing the chemistry of complex hydrocarbon mixtures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 31(11) (1992) 2483–2497.
[3] R.J. Quann, S.B. Jaffe, Building useful models of complex reaction systems in petroleum refining, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51(10) (1996) 1615–1635.
[4] Peng, Molecular Modelling of Petroleum Processes, University of Manchester Manchester, 1999.
[5] S. Feng, C. Cui, K.Y. Li, L.Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, S.Q. Zhao, C.M. Xu, Molecular composition modelling of petroleum fractions based on a hybrid structural unit and bond-electron matrix (SU-BEM) framework, Chem. Eng. Sci. 201(2019) 145–156.
[6] G. Christensen, M.R. Apelian, K.J. Hickey, S.B. Jaffe, Future directions in modeling the FCC process: An emphasis on product quality, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54(13–14) (1999) 2753–2764.
[7] N.V. Dewachtere, F. Santaella, G.F. Froment, Application of a single-event kinetic model in the simulation of an industrial riser reactor for the catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oil, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54(15–16) (1999) 3653–3660.
[8] P. Agarwal, M. Sahasrabudhe, S. Khandalkar, C. Saravanan, M.T. Klein, Molecular-level kinetic modeling of a real vacuum gas oil hydroprocessing refinery system, Energy Fuels 33(10) (2019) 10143–10158.
[9] L. Pereira de Oliveira, J.J. Verstraete, M. Kolb, A Monte Carlo modeling methodology for the simulation of hydrotreating processes, Chem. Eng. J. 207–208(2012) 94–102.
[10] A. Alvarez-Majmutov, J.W. Chen, Stochastic modeling and simulation approach for industrial fixed-bed hydrocrackers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56(24) (2017) 6926–6938.
[11] X. Zhou, Z. Hou, J.G. Wang, W. Fang, A.Z. Ma, J.B. Guo, M.T. Klein, Molecularlevel kinetic model for C12 continuous catalytic reforming, Energy Fuels 32(6) (2018) 7078–7085.
[12] T. Billa, S.R. Horton, M. Sahasrabudhe, C. Saravanan, Z. Hou, P. Agarwal, J. Lucio-Vega, M.T. Klein, Enhancing the value of detailed kinetic models through the development of interrogative software applications, Comput. Chem. Eng. 106(2017) 512–528.
[13] K.M. Van Geem, M.F. Reyniers, G.B. Marin, J. Song, W.H. Green, D.M. Matheu, Automatic reaction network generation using RMG for steam cracking of nhexane, AIChE J. 52(2) (2006) 718–730.
[14] Y. Ren, G.S. Guo, Z.W. Liao, Y. Yang, J.Y. Sun, B.B. Jiang, J.D. Wang, Y.R. Yang, Kinetic modeling with automatic reaction network generator, an application to naphtha steam cracking, Energy 207(2020) 118204.
[15] L.D. Tian, B.X. Shen, J.C. Liu, A delayed coking model built using the structureoriented lumping method, Energy Fuels 26(3) (2012) 1715–1724.
[16] L.D. Tian, B.X. Shen, J.C. Liu, Building and application of delayed coking structure-oriented lumping model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(10) (2012) 3923–3931.
[17] S.R. Horton, L.Z. Zhang, Z. Hou, C.A. Bennett, M.T. Klein, S.Q. Zhao, Molecularlevel kinetic modeling of resid pyrolysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54(16) (2015) 4226–4235.
[18] L.Z. Zhang, Z. Hou, S.R. Horton, M.T. Klein, Q. Shi, S.Q. Zhao, C.M. Xu, Molecular representation of petroleum vacuum resid, Energy Fuels 28(3) (2014) 1736–1749.
[19] R.A. Aguilar, J. Ancheyta, Modeling coil and soaker reactors for visbreaking, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(4) (2016) 912–924.
[20] A. Guerra, R. Symonds, S. Bryson, C. Kirney, B. Di Bacco, A. Macchi, R. Hughes, Five-lump mild thermal cracking reaction model of crude oils and bitumen with VLE calculations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58(36) (2019) 16417–16430.
[21] Z.Y. Chen, S. Feng, L.Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, Z.M. Xu, S.Q. Zhao, C.M. Xu, Molecularlevel kinetic modelling of fluid catalytic cracking slurry oil hydrotreating, Chem. Eng. Sci. 195(2019) 619–630.
[22] Z.Y. Chen, S. Feng, L.Z. Zhang, G. Wang, Q. Shi, Z.M. Xu, S.Q. Zhao, C.M. Xu, Molecular-level kinetic modeling of heavy oil fluid catalytic cracking process based on hybrid structural unit and bond-electron matrix, AIChE J. 67(2021) e17027.
[23] D. Guan, Z.Y. Chen, X. Chen, Y. Zhang, Q.Y. Qi, Q. Shi, S.Q. Zhao, C.M. Xu, L.Z. Zhang, Molecular-level heavy petroleum hydrotreating modeling and comparison with high-resolution mass spectrometry, Fuel 297(2021) 120792.
[24] L.Z. Zhang, Z.M. Xu, Q. Shi, X.W. Sun, N. Zhang, Y.H. Zhang, K.H. Chung, C.M. Xu, S.Q. Zhao, Molecular characterization of polar heteroatom species in Venezuela Orinoco petroleum vacuum residue and its supercritical fluid extraction subfractions, Energy Fuels 26(9) (2012) 5795–5803.
[25] T.D. Walter, M.T. Klein, A mechanistic model of the pyrolysis chemistry of 4-(1-naphthylmethyl)bibenzyl as a probe of hydrocarbon structure/reactivity relationships, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34(12) (1995) 4244–4253.
[26] P.E. Savage, Mechanisms and kinetics models for hydrocarbon pyrolysis, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 54(1–2) (2000) 109–126.
[27] A. Nigam, M.T. Klein, A mechanism-oriented lumping strategy for heavy hydrocarbon pyrolysis: Imposition of quantitative structure-reactivity relationships for pure components, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32(7) (1993) 1297–1303.
[28] B. Shukla, A. Susa, A. Miyoshi, M. Koshi, In situ direct sampling mass spectrometric study on formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in toluene pyrolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A 111(34) (2007) 8308–8324.
[29] R.E. Humburg, P.E. Savage, Pyrolysis of polycyclic perhydroarenes. 1. 9-ndodecylperhydroanthracene, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35(1996) 2096–2102.
[30] A. de Klerk, Thermal conversion modeling of visbreaking at temperatures below 400℃, Energy Fuels 34(12) (2020) 15285–15298.
[31] T.I. Mizan, P.E. Savage, B. Perry, Pyrolysis of polycyclic perhydroarenes. 2.1-nundecylperhydronaphthalene, Energy Fuels 11(1) (1997) 107–115.
[32] C.M. Smith, P.E. Savage, Reactions of polycyclic alkylaromatics. 1. Pathways, kinetics, and mechanisms for 1-dodecylpyrene pyrolysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 30(1991) 331–339.
[33] M.G. Evans, M. Polanyi, Some applications of the transition state method to the calculation of reaction velocities, especially in solution, Trans. Faraday Soc. 31(1935) 875.
[34] I. Mochida, Linear free energy relationships in heterogeneous catalysis II. Dealkylation and isomerization reactions on various solid acid catalysts, J. Catal. 7(4) (1967) 393–396.
[35] C.M. Smith, P.E. Savage, Reactions of polycyclic alkylaromatics: Structure and reactivity, AIChE J. 37(11) (1991) 1613–1624.
[36] J.W. Chen, N. Wang, F. Mederos, J. Ancheyta, Vapor-liquid equilibrium study in trickle-bed reactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48(3) (2009) 1096–1106.
[37] J.W. Chen, V. Mulgundmath, N. Wang, Accounting for Vapor-Liquid equilibrium in the modeling and simulation of a commercial hydrotreating reactor, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50(3) (2011) 1571–1579.