Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2017.09.023

Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 1599-1604.DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2017.09.023

• Selected Papers from the Chinese Process Systems Engineering Annual Meeting 2017 • 下一篇

Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems

Liang Ming, Jinsong Zhao

Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Industrial Big Data System and Application, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

收稿日期:2017-09-08 出版日期:2018-08-28 发布日期:2018-09-21
通讯作者: Jinsong Zhao,E-mail address:jinsongzhao@tsinghua.edu.cne
基金资助:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61433001).

Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems

Liang Ming, Jinsong Zhao

Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Industrial Big Data System and Application, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2017-09-08 Online:2018-08-28 Published:2018-09-21
Contact: Jinsong Zhao,E-mail address:jinsongzhao@tsinghua.edu.cne
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61433001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： With the Industry 4.0 era coming, modern chemical plants will be gradually transformed into smart factories, which sets higher requirements for fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) to enhance operation safety intelligence. In a typical chemical process, there are hundreds of process variables. Feature selection is a key to the efficiency and effectiveness of FDD. Even though artificial immune system has advantages in adaptation and independency on a large number of fault samples, antibody library construction used to be based on experience. It is not only time consuming, but also lack of scientific foundation in fault feature selection, which may deteriorate the FDD performance of the AIS. In this paper, a fault antibody feature selection optimization (FAFSO) algorithm is proposed based on genetic algorithm to optimize the fault antibody features and the antibody libraries' thresholds simultaneously. The performance of the proposed FAFSO algorithms is illustrated through the Tennessee Eastman benchmark problem.

关键词: Artificial immune system, Genetic algorithm, Feature selection

Abstract: With the Industry 4.0 era coming, modern chemical plants will be gradually transformed into smart factories, which sets higher requirements for fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) to enhance operation safety intelligence. In a typical chemical process, there are hundreds of process variables. Feature selection is a key to the efficiency and effectiveness of FDD. Even though artificial immune system has advantages in adaptation and independency on a large number of fault samples, antibody library construction used to be based on experience. It is not only time consuming, but also lack of scientific foundation in fault feature selection, which may deteriorate the FDD performance of the AIS. In this paper, a fault antibody feature selection optimization (FAFSO) algorithm is proposed based on genetic algorithm to optimize the fault antibody features and the antibody libraries' thresholds simultaneously. The performance of the proposed FAFSO algorithms is illustrated through the Tennessee Eastman benchmark problem.

Key words: Artificial immune system, Genetic algorithm, Feature selection

Liang Ming, Jinsong Zhao. Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(8): 1599-1604.

Liang Ming, Jinsong Zhao. Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems[J]. Chin.J.Chem.Eng., 2018, 26(8): 1599-1604.

参考文献

[1] S. Weyer, M. Schmitt, M. Ohmer, D. Gorecky, Towards Industry 4.0-standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems, IFACPap. Online 48-3(2015) 579-584.

[2] P.D. Christofides, J.F. Davis, N.H. EI-Farra, D. Clark, K.R.D. Harris, J.N. Gipson, Smart plant operations:vision, process and challenges, AIChE J. 53(2007) 2734-2741.

[3] Dai Yiyang, Hangzhou Wang, Khan Faisal, Zhao Jinsong, Abnormal situation management for smart chemical process operation, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 14(2016) 49-55.

[4] Shu Yidan, Zhao Jinsong, Fault diagnosis of chemical processes using artificial immune system with vaccine transplant, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(2016) 3360-3371.

[5] Dai Yiyang, Zhao Jinsong, Fault diagnosis of batch chemical processes using a dynamic time warping (DTW)-based artificial immune system, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50(2011) 4534-4544.

[6] K. Ghosh, M. Ramteke, R. Srinivasan, Optimal variable selection for effective statistical process monitoring, Comput. Chem. Eng. 60(2014) 260-276.

[7] Z.H. Sun, G. Bebis, R. Miller, Object detection using feature subset selection, Pattern Recogn. 37(11) (2004) 2165-2167.

[8] I. Inza, P. Larranaga, R. Blanco, et al., Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains, Artif. Intell. Med. 31(2) (2004) 91-103.

[9] Zhou Xiaobo, Xiaodong Wang, E.R. Dougherty, Nonlinear probit gene classification using mutual information and wavelet based feature selection, Biol. Syst. 12(3) (2004) 371-386.

[10] T.S. Furey, N. Cristianini, N. Duffy, et al., Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data, Bioinformatics 16(10) (2000) 906-914.

[11] I. Tabus, J. Astola, On the use of MDL principle in gene expression prediction, EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 4(2001) 297-303.

[12] Liu Huiqing, Li Jinyan, L. Wong, A comparative study on feature selection and classification methods using gene expression profiles and proteomic patterns, Genome Inform. 13(2002) 51-60.

[13] Chen Xuewen, An improved branch and bound algorithm for feature selection, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 24(12) (2003) 1925-1933.

[14] L. Zhang, L.B. Jack, A.K. Nandi, Fault detection using genetic programming, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 19(2005) 271-289.

[15] S.W. Lin, S.C. Chen, PSOLDA:a particle swarm optimization approach for enhancing classification accuracy rate of linear discrimination analysis, Appl. Soft Comput. 9(2009) 1008-1015.

[16] I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Brarnhill, et al., Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machine, Mach. Learn. 46(1/2/3) (2002) 389-422.

[17] A.K. Jain, D. Zongker, Feature selection:evaluation application, and small sample performance, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19(2007) 153-158.

[18] M.L. Raymer, W.F. Punch, E.D. Goodman, L.A. Kuhn, A.K. Jain, Dimensionality reduction using genetic algorithm, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 4(2) (2000) 164-171.

[19] S. Verron, T. Tiplica, A. Kobi, Fault detection and identification with a new feature selection based on mutual information, J. Process Control 18(2008) 479-490.

[20] R.A. Goldsby, T.J. Kindt, B.A. Osborne, J. Kuby, Immunology, 5th edition W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA, 2003.

[21] L.N. de Castro, J.I. Timmis, Artificial immune systems:a novel paradigm to pattern recognition, in:J.M. Corchado, L. Alonso, C. Fyfe (Eds.), Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition, University of Paisley, U.K. 2002, pp. 67-84.

[22] L.H. Chiang, E.L. Russell, R.D. Braatz, Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems, Springer-Verlag London Limited, Briton, 2001.

[23] A. Bathelt, N.L. Ricker, M. Jelali, Revision of the Tennessee Eastman Process model, IFAC (Int. Fed. Automatic Control) Pap. Online 48(8) (2015) 309-314.

[24] S. Yin, S.X. Ding, A. Haghani, H.Y. Hao, P. Zhang, A comparison study of basic datadriven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process, J. Process Control 22(2012) 1567-1581.

[25] M.A.A. Rad, M.J. Yazdanpanah, Designing supervised local neural network classifiers based on EM clustering for fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 146(2015) 149-157.

[26] Q.C. Jiang, B. Huang, X.F. Yan, GMM and optimal principal components-based Bayesian method for multimode fault diagnosis, Comput. Chem. Eng. 84(2016) 338-349.

Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems

Feature selection for chemical process fault diagnosis by artificial immune systems

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	Tong Qin, Zhenhao Xi, Ling Zhao, Weikang Yuan. Monte Carlo simulation of sequential structure control of AN-MA-IA aqueous copolymerization by different operation modes[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2022, 46(6): 231-242.
[2]	Zhiquan Wang, Liang Wang, Zhihong Yuan, Bingzhen Chen. Data-driven optimal operation of the industrial methanol to olefin process based on relevance vector machine[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 34(6): 106-115.
[3]	Mirollah Hosseini, Hamid Hassanzadeh Afrouzi, Sina Yarmohammadi, Hossein Arasteh, Davood Toghraie, A. Jafarian Amiri, Arash Karimipour. Optimization of FX-70 refrigerant evaporative heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics inside the corrugated tubes using multi-objective genetic algorithm[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2020, 28(8): 2142-2151.
[4]	Ali Darvishi, Ali Bakhtyari, Mohammad Reza Rahimpour. A sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization to enhance ethylene production by oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane in a membrane-assisted reactor[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(9): 1879-1895.
[5]	Jianxin Wang, Na Yu, Mengqi Chen, Lin Cong, Lanyi Sun. Composition control and temperature inferential control of dividing wall column based on model predictive control and PI strategies[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(5): 1087-1101.
[6]	Weijun Li, Jakob Kjøbsted Huusom, Zhimao Zhou, Yi Nie, Yajing Xu, Xiangping Zhang. Multi-objective optimization of methane production system from biomass through anaerobic digestion[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(10): 2084-2092.
[7]	Peng Jiang, Wenli Du. Multi-objective modeling and optimization for scheduling of cracking furnace systems[J]. , 2017, 25(8): 992-999.
[8]	Ke Yang, Yijun He, Zifeng Ma. Multi-objective steady-state optimization of two-chamber microbial fuel cells[J]. , 2017, 25(8): 1000-1012.
[9]	Wuthichai Wongthatsanekorn, Busaba Phruksaphanrat. Genetic algorithm for short-term scheduling of make-and-pack batch production process[J]. , 2015, 23(9): 1475-1483.
[10]	Kai Feng, Jiangang Lu, Jinshui Chen. Nonlinearmodel predictive control based on support vectormachine and genetic algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(12): 2048-2052.
[11]	Shuo Lin, Fangjun Luan, Zhonghua Han, Xisheng Lü, Xiaofeng Zhou, Wei Liu. Genetic Algorithm Based on Duality Principle for Bilevel Programming Problem in Steel-making Production[J]. , 2014, 22(7): 742-747.
[12]	Yulei Ge, Shurong Li, Kexin Qu. A Novel Empirical Equation for Relative Permeability in Low Permeability Reservoirs[J]. , 2014, 22(11/12): 1274-1278.
[13]	徐圆, 王振宇, 朱群雄. An Improved Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Chemical Plant Layout Optimization with Novel Non-overlapping and Toxic Gas Dispersion Constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013, 21(4): 412-419.
[14]	孙帆, 杜文莉, 祁荣宾, 钱锋, 钟伟民. A Hybrid Improved Genetic Algorithm and Its Application in Dynamic Optimization Problems of Chemical Processes[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013, 21(2): 144-154.
[15]	陶莉莉, 孔祥东, 钟伟民, 钱锋. Modified Self-adaptive Immune Genetic Algorithm for Optimization of Combustion Side Reaction of p-Xylene Oxidation^*[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 20(6): 1047-1052.