The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH4 and CO2 hydrates

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2024.09.021

中国化学工程学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 77 ›› Issue (1): 167-174.DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2024.09.021

The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates

Lejun Wu¹, Jingbo Gao², Jing Li², Haibo Liu¹, Qiang Sun²

1. China Oilfield Services Limited, Sanhe 065201, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

收稿日期:2024-04-19 修回日期:2024-09-05 接受日期:2024-09-05 出版日期:2025-01-28 发布日期:2024-10-30
通讯作者: Qiang Sun,E-mail:sunq@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (22278424, 22127812, 22008257).

The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates

Lejun Wu¹, Jingbo Gao², Jing Li², Haibo Liu¹, Qiang Sun²

1. China Oilfield Services Limited, Sanhe 065201, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

Received:2024-04-19 Revised:2024-09-05 Accepted:2024-09-05 Online:2025-01-28 Published:2024-10-30
Contact: Qiang Sun,E-mail:sunq@cup.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (22278424, 22127812, 22008257).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： As a kind of novel environmental-friendly surfactant, Gemini surfactant has attracted extensive research interests in its effects on gas hydrate formation. We investigated the effects of dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT) on the formation thermodynamics/kinetics of CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates. Experimental results indicate that while AOT does not exhibit significant thermodynamic promotion for hydrate formation, it demonstrates favorable kinetic promotion effects. Its promotion effect surpasses that of the traditional kinetic promoter SDS and can enhance the gas storage capacity of hydrates. Utilizing the Chen-Guo hydrate model and adsorption kinetic model, we established a kinetic model for AOT with a predictive deviation of 7.17% and fitted key parameters accordingly.

关键词: Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT), CH₄/CO₂ hydrates, Thermodynamics/kinetics, Hydrate promoter, Kinetic model

Abstract: As a kind of novel environmental-friendly surfactant, Gemini surfactant has attracted extensive research interests in its effects on gas hydrate formation. We investigated the effects of dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT) on the formation thermodynamics/kinetics of CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates. Experimental results indicate that while AOT does not exhibit significant thermodynamic promotion for hydrate formation, it demonstrates favorable kinetic promotion effects. Its promotion effect surpasses that of the traditional kinetic promoter SDS and can enhance the gas storage capacity of hydrates. Utilizing the Chen-Guo hydrate model and adsorption kinetic model, we established a kinetic model for AOT with a predictive deviation of 7.17% and fitted key parameters accordingly.

Key words: Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT), CH₄/CO₂ hydrates, Thermodynamics/kinetics, Hydrate promoter, Kinetic model

Lejun Wu, Jingbo Gao, Jing Li, Haibo Liu, Qiang Sun. The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2025, 77(1): 167-174.

Lejun Wu, Jingbo Gao, Jing Li, Haibo Liu, Qiang Sun. The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2025, 77(1): 167-174.

参考文献

[1] Sloan, E.D.; Koh, C.A. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, 3rd ed.， CRC Press，Boca Raton, FL,USA，2008.
[2] P. Babu, P. Linga, R. Kumar, P. Englezos, A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture, Energy 85(2015) 261-279.
[3] I. Ben Attouche Sfaxi, V. Belandria, A.H. Mohammadi, R. Lugo, D. Richon, Phase equilibria of CO₂+N₂ and CO₂+CH₄ clathrate hydrates: Experimental measurements and thermodynamic modelling, Chem. Eng. Sci. 84(2012) 602-611.
[4] A. Eslamimanesh, A.H. Mohammadi, D. Richon, P. Naidoo, D. Ramjugernath, Application of gas hydrate formation in separation processes: A review of experimental studies, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 46(2012) 62-71.
[5] H. Ganji, M. Manteghian, K. Sadaghiani zadeh, M.R. Omidkhah, H. Rahimi Mofrad, Effect of different surfactants on methane hydrate formation rate, stability and storage capacity, Fuel 86(3) (2007) 434-441.
[6] E. Sadeh, A. Farhadian, M. Maddah, M.E. Semenov, A. Mohammadi, F. Wang, Branched sulfonated promoter: Achieving high methane uptake and foam-free gas recovery for solidified gas storage, Chem. Eng. J. 487(2024) 150674.
[7] A. Farhadian, A. Mohammadi, M. Maddah, E. Sadeh, R. Nowruzi, R. Sharifi, Z.T. Rizi, M.M. Taheri, Y. Seo, Enhanced methane hydrate formation using a newly synthesized biosurfactant: Application to solidified gas storage, Energy 291(2024) 130290.
[8] E. Sadeh, A. Farhadian, A. Mohammadi, M. Maddah, M. Pourfath, M.J. Yang, Energy-efficient storage of methane and carbon dioxide capture in the form of clathrate hydrates using a novel non-foaming surfactant: An experimental and computational investigation, Energy Convers. Manag. 293(2023) 117475.
[9] X.J. Liu, J.J. Ren, D.Y. Chen, Z.Y. Yin, Comparison of SDS and L-methionine in promoting CO₂ hydrate kinetics: Implication for hydrate-based CO₂ storage, Chem. Eng. J. 438(2022) 135504.
[10] K. Inkong, P. Rangsunvigit, S. Kulprathipanja, P. Linga, Effects of temperature and pressure on the methane hydrate formation with the presence of tetrahydrofuran (THF) as a promoter in an unstirred tank reactor, Fuel 255(2019) 115705.
[11] X.B. Zhou, D.Q. Liang, Enhanced performance on CO₂ adsorption and release induced by structural transition that occurred in TBAB·26H₂O hydrates, Chem. Eng. J. 378(2019) 122128.
[12] S. Rajabi Firoozabadi, M. Bonyadi, A comparative study on the effects of Fe₃O₄ nanofluid, SDS and CTAB aqueous solutions on the CO₂ hydrate formation, J. Mol. Liq. 300(2020) 112251.
[13] H. Pahlavanzadeh, M. Khanlarkhani, S. Rezaei, A.H. Mohammadi, Experimental and modelling studies on the effects of nanofluids (SiO₂, Al₂O₃, and CuO) and surfactants (SDS and CTAB) on CH₄ and CO₂ clathrate hydrates formation, Fuel 253(2019) 1392-1405.
[14] Song, Z. Science and application of surfactant; China Petrochemical Press，Beijing， 2015.
[15] Rosen, M. J. Geminis: a new generation of surfactants. Chem. Tech. 1993, 23(3), 30-33.
[16] Q. Sun, B. Chen, Y.Y. Li, G.Q. Yuan, Z. Xu, X.Q. Guo, X.X. Li, W.J. Lan, L.Y. Yang, Enhanced separation of coal bed methane via bioclathrates formation, Fuel 243(2019) 10-14.
[17] Q. Sun, B. Chen, Y.Y. Li, Z. Xu, X.Q. Guo, X.X. Li, W.J. Lan, L.Y. Yang, Promotion effects of mung starch on methane hydrate formation equilibria/rate and gas storage capacity, Fluid Phase Equilib. 475(2018) 95-99.
[18] S. Alizadeh, M. Manteghian, A. Jafari, A. Mohammadi, Sucralose, an eco-friendly novel promoter of carbon dioxide hydrate formation: Kinetic investigation, J. Mol. Liq. 395(2024) 123825.
[19] Abolfazl M. The Impact of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Methane Hydrate Volume Fraction in a Batch Rocking Cell Reactor. Prog. Biochem. Res. 2024, 7(1), 22-23.
[20] H.L. Huang, X.J. Liu, H.F. Lu, C.L. Xu, J.Z. Zhao, Y. Li, Y.H. Gu, Z.Y. Yin, Introducing sodium lignosulfonate as an effective promoter for CO₂ sequestration as hydrates targeting gaseous and liquid CO₂, Adv. Appl. Energy 14(2024) 100175.
[21] L.T. Chen, C.Y. Sun, G.J. Chen, Y.Q. Nie, Z.S. Sun, Y.T. Liu, Measurements of hydrate equilibrium conditions for CH₄, CO₂, and CH₄+ C₂H₆+ C₃H₈ in various systems by step-heating method, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 17(4) (2009) 635-641.
[22] H.L. Li, J.P. Jakobsen, J. Stang, Hydrate formation during CO₂ transport: Predicting water content in the fluid phase in equilibrium with the CO₂-hydrate, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Contr. 5(3) (2011) 549-554.
[23] G.J. Chen, T.M. Guo, A new approach to gas hydrate modelling, Chem. Eng. J. 71(2) (1998) 145-151.
[24] A. Mohammadi, N. Babakhanpour, A. Mohammad Javidani, G. Ahmadi, Corn’s dextrin, a novel environmentally friendly promoter of methane hydrate formation, J. Mol. Liq. 336(2021) 116855.
[25] L. Mu, H.X. Zhao, Z.Q. Zhou, J.G. Zeng, Q.Y. Cui, Improving methane hydrate formation kinetics and gas storage capacity with a promoter, Energy Fuels 37(19) (2023) 14778-14789.
[26] B.B. Ge, X.Y. Li, D.L. Zhong, Y.Y. Lu, Investigation of natural gas storage and transportation by gas hydrate formation in the presence of bio-surfactant sulfonated lignin, Energy 244(2022) 122665.
[27] H.P. Veluswamy, A. Kumar, R. Kumar, P. Linga, An innovative approach to enhance methane hydrate formation kinetics with leucine for energy storage application, Appl. Energy 188(2017) 190-199.
[28] Y.M. Song, R.Q. Liang, F. Wang, D.H. Zhang, L. Yang, D.B. Zhang, Enhanced methane hydrate formation in the highly dispersed carbon nanotubes-based nanofluid, Fuel 285(2021) 119234.
[29] D.W. Kang, W. Lee, Y.H. Ahn, J.W. Lee, Confined tetrahydrofuran in a superabsorbent polymer for sustainable methane storage in clathrate hydrates, Chem. Eng. J. 411(2021) 128512.
[30] A. Mohammadi, M. Manteghian, A.H. Mohammadi, A. Jahangiri, Induction time, storage capacity, and rate of methane hydrate formation in the presence of SDS and silver nanoparticles, Chem. Eng. Commun. 204(12) (2017) 1420-1427.
[31] A. Mohammadi, The roles TBAF and SDS on the kinetics of methane hydrate formation as a cold storage material, J. Mol. Liq. 309(2020) 113175.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	0

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	6

	来源	其他网站

	次数	6
	比例	100%

The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates

The investigation of Gemini surfactant effects on CH₄ and CO₂ hydrates

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	Bingying Han, Neng Shi, Mengjie Dong, Ye Liu, Runping Ye, Lixia Ling, Riguang Zhang, Baojun Wang. Theoretically predicted innovative palladium stripe dopingcobalt (1 1 1) surface with excellent catalytic performance for carbon monoxide oxidative coupling to dimethyl oxalate[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2024, 73(9): 235-243.
[2]	Dechang Cheng, Zhihong Ma, Ziyang Liu, Xiaohui Liu, Tao Liu, Weizhen Sun, Ling Zhao. Experiments and kinetic modeling of the sorbitol dehydration to isosorbide catalyzed by sulfuric acid under conditions of non-constant volume[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2024, 73(9): 281-289.
[3]	Huashuai Wu, Gang Wang, Yong Yang, Yongwang Li. Modeling analysis of cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2024, 70(6): 82-92.
[4]	Shen Li, Yin-Ning Zhou, Zhong-Xin Liu, Zheng-Hong Luo. Effect of solvent on the initiation mechanism of living anionic polymerization of styrene: A computational study[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2024, 69(5): 135-142.
[5]	Mingxue Yin, Bo Jia, Kuiyi You, Bo Jin, Yangqiang Huang, Xiao Luo, Zhiwu Liang. A highly efficient La-modified ZnAl-LDO catalyst and its performance in the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from methyl carbamate and methanol[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 61(9): 9-23.
[6]	Guangyuan Chen, Tong Zhou, Meng Zhang, Zhongxiang Ding, Zhikun Zhou, Yuanhui Ji, Haiying Tang, Changsong Wang. Effects of heavy metal ions Cu²⁺/Pb²⁺/Zn²⁺ on kinetic rate constants of struvite crystallization[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 57(5): 10-16.
[7]	Bowen Jiang, Jia Liu, Guoqiang Yang, Zhibing Zhang. Efficient conversion of CO₂ into cyclic carbonates under atmospheric by halogen and metal-free poly(ionic liquid)s[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 55(3): 202-211.
[8]	Yu-Gao Wang, Xiao-Chen Han, Bao Gu, Hua-Shuai Wu, Jun Shen. Insight into the green route to dimethyl succinate by direct esterification of bio-based disodium succinate using CO₂ and CH₃OH[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 64(12): 188-195.
[9]	Danlong Li, Yannan Liang, Hainan Wang, Ruoqian Zhou, Xiaokang Yan, Lijun Wang, Haijun Zhang. Investigation on the effects of fluid intensification based preconditioning process on the decarburization enhancement of fly ash[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2022, 44(4): 275-283.
[10]	Min Wu, Juanjuan Ding, Zhaofeng Zhang, Shengping You, Wei Qi, Rongxin Su, Zhimin He. Kinetic modeling of gamma-aminobutyric acid production by Lactobacillus brevis based on pH-dependent model and rolling correction[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2022, 50(10): 352-360.
[11]	Zhengyu Chen, Xinhui Yao, Dong Guan, Suoqi Zhao, Linzhou Zhang, Chunming Xu. Vacuum residue coking process simulation using molecular-level kinetic model coupled with vapor-liquid phase separation[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2022, 41(1): 301-310.
[12]	Xiaoda Wang, Wenkai Li, Shiwei Wang, Qinglian Wang, Ling Li, Hongxing Wang, Ting Qiu. Reaction kinetics for the heterogeneously resin-catalyzed and homogeneously self-catalyzed esterification of thioglycolic acid with 2-ethyl-1-hexanol[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 36(8): 111-119.
[13]	Yishan Zhou, Hao Qin, Hongye Cheng, Lifang Chen, Bingjian Zhang, Zhiwen Qi. Reactive extraction for synthesizing long chain ester butyl hexanoate intensified by deep eutectic solvent[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 36(8): 120-127.
[14]	Qiu Zhao, Gang Wang, Fuxia Liao, Yifan Sha, Fei Xu, Chunshan Li, Zengxi Li, Yijun Cao. Ionic liquid catalyzed solvent-free synthesis of chalcone and its derivatives under mild conditions[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 33(5): 160-166.
[15]	Hakima Kadji, Idris Yahiaoui, Zehira Garti, Abdeltif Amrane, Farida Aissani-Benissad. Kinetic degradation of amoxicillin by using the electro-Fenton process in the presence of a graphite rods from used batteries[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 32(4): 183-190.