运用层次分析法对化学产品的环境经济性能集成评价

• SYSTEM ENGINEERING • 上一篇下一篇

运用层次分析法对化学产品的环境经济性能集成评价

钱宇; 黄智贤; 闫志国

School of Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-02-28 发布日期:2007-02-28
通讯作者: 钱宇

Integrated assessment of environmental and economic performance of chemical products using analytic hierarchy process approach

QIAN Yu; HUANG Zhixian; YAN Zhiguo

School of Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-02-28 Published:2007-02-28
Contact: QIAN Yu

摘要/Abstract

摘要： With the increasing public consciousness on environmental issues, chemical products and process designs require simultaneous satisfaction and compromise of environmental and economical requirements. To fulfill the two con-flicting while complementary objectives, a systematic approach for life cycle design of a chemical product is proposed in this article. Multiattribute decision-making is adopted in a trade-off consideration of both technical economical evaluation and environmental impacts assessment using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. On the basis of an evaluation of the relative importance of the criteria multicriteria decision making is performed. In this study, an AHP model is used to derive single a criteria score by analyzing the environmental impact and life cycle cost of a product, respectively. And a fluctuant weight analysis is put forth to calculate the integrated index of the product to enable products to be ranked or selected intuitionally and conveniently. The proposed AHP model has been applied to a case study, a comparative study on chamber cleaning with NF3 and C2F6. The results show that the proposed AHP model is capable of providing a rational and relevant evaluation.

关键词: life cycle assessment;life cycle cost;analytic hierarchy process;chemical product

Abstract: With the increasing public consciousness on environmental issues, chemical products and process designs require simultaneous satisfaction and compromise of environmental and economical requirements. To fulfill the two con-flicting while complementary objectives, a systematic approach for life cycle design of a chemical product is proposed in this article. Multiattribute decision-making is adopted in a trade-off consideration of both technical economical evaluation and environmental impacts assessment using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. On the basis of an evaluation of the relative importance of the criteria multicriteria decision making is performed. In this study, an AHP model is used to derive single a criteria score by analyzing the environmental impact and life cycle cost of a product, respectively. And a fluctuant weight analysis is put forth to calculate the integrated index of the product to enable products to be ranked or selected intuitionally and conveniently. The proposed AHP model has been applied to a case study, a comparative study on chamber cleaning with NF3 and C2F6. The results show that the proposed AHP model is capable of providing a rational and relevant evaluation.

Key words: life cycle assessment, life cycle cost, analytic hierarchy process, chemical product

钱宇, 黄智贤, 闫志国. 运用层次分析法对化学产品的环境经济性能集成评价[J]. , DOI: .

QIAN ,Yu, HUANG ,Zhixian, YAN ,Zhiguo. Integrated assessment of environmental and economic performance of chemical products using analytic hierarchy process approach[J]. , DOI: .

参考文献

1    Qian, Y., Yan, Z.G., Zhang, L.J., “Challenge and chance in integrated study of chemical product life cycle deci-sion”, Development in Natural Science (Chinese), 14(11), 1115—1120(2004). (in Chinese)
2    Yan, Z.G., Qian, Y., “Theory and method of life cycle de-sign for chemical products”, Modern Chemical Industry (Chinese), 21(8), 63—65(2004). (in Chinese)
3    Burgess, A.A., Brennan, D.J., “Application of life cycle assessment to chemical processes”, Chemical Engineer-ing Science, 56(8), 2589—2604(2001).
4    Rivela, B., Moreira, M.T., “Life Cycle assessment as a tool for the environmental improvement of the tannery industry in developing countries”, Environmental Science & Technology, 38(6), 1901—1909(2004).
5    Kniel, G.E., Delmarco, K., Petrie, J.G., “Life cycle as-sessment applied to process design: Environmental and economic analysis and optimisation of a nitric acid plant”, Environmental Progress, 15(4), 221—228(1996).
6    Hernandez, O.R., Pistikopoulos, E.N., Livingston, A.G., “Waste treatment and optimal degree of pollution abate-ment”, Environmental Progress, 17(4), 270—276(1998).
7    Azapagic, A., “Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection design and optimization”, Chemical Engineering Journal, 73, 1—21(1999).
8    Faisal, I.K., Rehan, S., Tahir, H., “GreenPro-I: a risk-based life cycle assessment and decision-making methodology for process plant design”, Environmental Modeling & Software, 17, 669—692(2002).
9    Ren, H., Yang, Y.S., Cao, L.J., “Food life cycle assess-ment method and its application” Transactions of the CSAE, 26(1), 19—23(2006).
10    Jiang, J.L., Xu, J.C., Hou, S.L., “LCA study on electrolytic nickel and copper produced by coexistence ore”, Acta Scientiae Circumstantia, 25(11), 1570—1575(2005). (in Chinese)
11    Chen, H., Hao, W.C., “Life cycle assessment of several typical macromolecular material”, Acta Scientiae Cir-cumstantia, 24(3), 545—549(2004). (in Chinese)
12    Zheng, B., Zhao, X.X., Ma, X.Q., “Life cycle assessment and its application”, China Resource Comprehensive Utilization, (3), 102—106(2004).
13    Lundie, S., Peters, G.M., Beavis, P., “Life cycle assess-ment for sustainable metropolitan water systems plan-ning”, Environmental Science & Technology, 38(13), 3465—3473(2004).
14    Qian, Y., Huang, Z.X., Jiang, Y.B., “Life cycle costing of chemical product”, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 25(2), 126—131(2006).
15    Glucha, P., Baumannb, H., “The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision making”, Building and Environ-ment, (39), 571—580(2004).
16    Yan, Z.G., Qian, Y., “Multi-attribute decision-making for life cycle design of chemical product”, In: The 7th World Congress on Recovery, Recycling and Re-integration, Beijing (2005).
17    Siedu, Y., Gu, P., “Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review”, International Journal of Production Research, 36(4), 883—908(1998).
18    Bengt, S., “A systematic approach to environmental strategies in product development (EPS)”, Chalmers University of Technology, Technical Environmental Planning. (1999).
19    Kinoshita, E.N., “Proposal of new AHP model in light of dominant relationship among alternatives”, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 42(2), 180—197(1999).
20    Dantus, M.M., “Evaluation of waste minimization alter-natives under uncertainty: a multiobjective optimization approach”, Computer and Chemical Engineering, 23(10), 1493—1508(1999).
21    Zhou, Z.Y., Cheng, S.W., Hua, B., Zeng, M.G., Yin, Q.H., “An investment decision support system for process in-dustries”, Chineses Journal of Chemical Engineering, 9(4), 402—406(2001).
22    Young, I.L., “Multiobjective optimization in terms of economics and potential environmental impact for proc-ess design and analysis in a chemical process simulator”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(11), 4729—4741(1999).
23    Cabeza, H., Douglas, M.Y., “Pollution prevention with chemical pocess simulation: the generalized waste reduc-tion (WAR) algorithm”, Computer and Chemical Engi-neering, 23, 1477—1486(1999).
24    Pennington, D.W., Norris, G., Hoagland, T., “Metrics for environmental comparison of process and product alter-natives in a holistic framework”, Clean Products and Processes, 2(2), 82—91(2000).
25    Yan, Z.G., “Integrated life cycle assessment of environ-mental and economical performance of chemical prod-ucts”, Ph D. thesis, South China University of Technol-ogy (2005).