Simulation of drop breakage in liquid-liquid system by coupling of CFD and PBM: Comparison of breakage kernels and effects of agitator configurations

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2018.10.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要： This work focuses on drop breakage for liquid-liquid system with an adoption of numerical simulation by using computational fluid dynamics and population balance model (PBM) coupled with two-fluid model (TFM). Two different breakage kernels based on identical breakage mechanism but different descriptions of breaking time are taken into account in this work. Eight cases corresponding to distinct configurations of agitator are carried out to validate numerical predictions, namely agitators with different porosity and hole diameters, respectively implemented in Cases 1 to 5 and Cases 6 to 8. The results are compared with experimental data for testing the applicability of both kernels. Simulations are implemented, in this work, with an approach of class method for the solution of population balance model by the special-purpose computational fluid dynamics solver Fluent 16.1 based on finite volume method, and the grids used for meshing the solution domain are accomplished in a commercial software Gambit 2.4.6. The effects of configurations of agitator corresponding to different parameters mentioned above on final Sauter mean diameter are equally concentrated in this work. Analysis of both kernels and comparisons with experimental results reveal that, the second kernel has more decent agreement with experiments, and the results of investigations on effects of agitator configurations show that the influences of these parameters on Sauter mean diameter are marginal, but appropriate porosity and hole diameter are actually able to decrease Sauter mean diameter. These outcomes allow us to draw general conclusions and help investigate performances of liquid-liquid system.

关键词: Stirred vessel, Liquid-liquid system, Computational fluid dynamics, Population balance model, Breakage kernel, Agitator configuration

Abstract: This work focuses on drop breakage for liquid-liquid system with an adoption of numerical simulation by using computational fluid dynamics and population balance model (PBM) coupled with two-fluid model (TFM). Two different breakage kernels based on identical breakage mechanism but different descriptions of breaking time are taken into account in this work. Eight cases corresponding to distinct configurations of agitator are carried out to validate numerical predictions, namely agitators with different porosity and hole diameters, respectively implemented in Cases 1 to 5 and Cases 6 to 8. The results are compared with experimental data for testing the applicability of both kernels. Simulations are implemented, in this work, with an approach of class method for the solution of population balance model by the special-purpose computational fluid dynamics solver Fluent 16.1 based on finite volume method, and the grids used for meshing the solution domain are accomplished in a commercial software Gambit 2.4.6. The effects of configurations of agitator corresponding to different parameters mentioned above on final Sauter mean diameter are equally concentrated in this work. Analysis of both kernels and comparisons with experimental results reveal that, the second kernel has more decent agreement with experiments, and the results of investigations on effects of agitator configurations show that the influences of these parameters on Sauter mean diameter are marginal, but appropriate porosity and hole diameter are actually able to decrease Sauter mean diameter. These outcomes allow us to draw general conclusions and help investigate performances of liquid-liquid system.

Key words: Stirred vessel, Liquid-liquid system, Computational fluid dynamics, Population balance model, Breakage kernel, Agitator configuration

Rui Xie, Jun Li, Yang Jin, Da Zou, Ming Chen. Simulation of drop breakage in liquid-liquid system by coupling of CFD and PBM: Comparison of breakage kernels and effects of agitator configurations[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2019, 27(5): 1001-1014.

参考文献

[1] J.G. Chen, D.Y. Luan, X.C. Zhu, Study on mechanism of strengthened vortex fusion for a punched agitator, Adv. Mater. Res. 221(2011) 694-700.
[2] H.R. Ye, Study on the performances of a large triangle agitator, Shanghai Chem. Ind. 6(1990) 37-39(in Chinese).
[3] Z.M. Gao, D.Y. Li, A. Buffo, Simulation of droplet breakage in turbulent liquid-liquid dispersions with CFD-PBM:Comparison of breakage kernels, Chem. Eng. Sci. 142(2016) 277-288.
[4] S. Maaß, T. Rehm, M. Kraume, Prediction of drop sizes for liquid-liquid systems in stirred slim reactors. Part Ⅱ:Multi-stage impellers, Chem. Eng. Sci. 168(2011) 827-838.
[5] G.L. Lane, M.P. Schwarz, G.M. Evans, Numerical modelling of gas-liquid flow in stirred tanks, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60(2005) 2203-2214.
[6] C. Drumm, M.M. Attarakih, H. Bart, Coupling of CFD with DPBM for an RDC extractor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 64(2009) 721-732.
[7] D.A. Drew, Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15(1983) 261-291.
[8] D.A. Drew, S.L. Passman, Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, 135, Springer, New York, 1999.
[9] X. Hu, A. Passalacqua, R.O. Fox, Application of quadrature-based uncertainty quantification to the NETL small-scale challenge problem SSCP-I, Powder Technol. 272(2015) 100-112.
[10] M.M. Attarakih, M. Hlawitschka, M. Abu-Khader, S. Al-Zyod, H. Bart, CFD-population balance modelling and simulation of coupled hydrodynamics and mass transfer in liquid extraction columns, Appl. Math. Model. 39(2015) 5105-5120.
[11] J.L. Favero, L.F.L.R. Silva, P.L.C. Lage, Modelling and simulation of mixing in water-in-oil emulsion flow through a valve-like element using a population balance model, Comput. Chem. Eng. 75(2015) 155-170.
[12] S. Kumar, D. Ramkrishna, On the solution of population balance equations by discretization-I. A fixed pivot technique, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51(1996) 1311-1332.
[13] H.M. Hulburt, S. Katz, Some problems in particle technology:A statistical mechanical formulation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 19(1964) 555-574.
[14] Y.L. Lin, K. Lee, T. Matsoukas, Solution of the population balance equation using constant number Monte Carlo, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57(2002) 2241-2252.
[15] A. Buffo, M. Vanni, D.L. Marchisio, R.O. Fox, Multivariate quadrature-based moments methods for turbulent polydisperse gas-liquid systems, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 50(2013) 41-57.
[16] Y.X. Liao, D. Lucas, A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 64(2009) 3389-3406.
[17] C.A. Coulaloglou, L.L. Tavlarides, Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 32(1977) 1289-1297.
[18] G. Narsimhan, J.P. Gupta, A model for transitional breakage probability of droplets in agitated lean liquid-liquid dispersions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 34(1979) 257-265.
[19] V. Alopaeus, et al., Simulation of the population balances for liquid-liquid systems in a nonideal stirred tank. Part 2 Parameter fitting and the use of the multiblock model for dense dispersions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57(2002) 1815-1825.
[20] S. Maaß, M. Kraume, Determination of breakage rates using single drop experiments, Chem. Eng. Sci. 70(2012) 146-164.
[21] B. Selma, R. Bannari, P. Proulx, Simulation of bubbly flows:Comparison between direct quadrature method of moments (DQMOM) and method of classes (CM), Chem. Eng. Sci. 65(2010) 1925-1941.
[22] Fluent Inc, FLUENT User's Guide, Fluent Inc, 2003.
[23] J.O. Hinze, Turbulence, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
[24] P. Rollet-Miet, D. Laurence, J. Ferziger, LES and RANS of turbulent flow in tube bundles, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 20(1999) 241-254.
[25] A.D. Gosman, C. Lekakou, S. Politis, R.I. Issa, M.K. Looney, Multidimensional modeling of turbulent two-phase flows in stirred vessel, AIChE J. 38(1992) 1946-1956.
[26] A. Behzadi, R.I. Issa, H. Rusche, Modeling of dispersed bubble and droplet flow at high phase fractions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59(2004) 759-770.
[27] H. Rusche, Computational Fluid Dynamics of Dispersed Two-phase flows at High Phase Fractions (Ph.D. thesis), Imperial College, London, 2003.
[28] L. Schiller, A. Naumann, A drag coefficient correlation, VDI Ztg. 77(1935) 51-86.
[29] A. Buffo, D.L. Marchisio, Modeling and simulation of turbulent polydisperse gas-liquid systems via the generalized population balance equation, Rev. Chem. Eng. 30(2014) 73-126.
[30] D. Ramkrishna, Population balances:Theory and Applications to Particulate Systems in Engineering, Academic Press, London, 2000.
[31] A. Buffo, J.D. Bona, M. Vanni, D.L. Marchisio, Simplified volume averaged models for liquid-liquid dispersions correct derivation and comparison with other approaches, Chem. Eng. Sci. 153(2016) 382-393.
[32] M.J. Hounslow, R.L. Ryall, V.R. Marshall, A discretized population balance for nucleation, growth and aggregation, AIChE J. 34(1988) 1821-1832.
[33] J.D. Litster, D.J. Smit, M.J. Hounslow, Adjustable discretization population balance for growth and aggregation, AIChE J. 41(1995) 591-603.
[34] C.M. Stoots, R.V. Calabrese, Mean velocity-field relative to a Rushton turbine blade, AIChE J. 41(1995) 1-11.
[35] J.M.H. Janssen, H.E.H. Meijer, Droplet breakup mechanisms:Step wise equilibrium versus transient dispersion, J. Rheol. 37(1993) 597-608.
[36] W. G.P. Mietus, O. K. Matar, C. J. Lawrence, B. J. Briscoe, Droplet deformation in confined shear and extensional flow, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57(2002) 1217-1230.
[37] S. Kumar, V. Ganvir, C. Satyanand, R. Kumar, K.S. Gandhi, Alternative mechanisms of drop breakup in stirred vessels, Chem. Eng. Sci. 53(1998) 3269-3280.
[38] P. Walstra, Principles pf emulsion formation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 48(1993) 333-349.
[39] A.W. Pacek, C.C. Man, A.W. Nienow, Coalescence rates in water-in-oil and oil-inwater dispersions, 9th European Conference on Mixing, Paris, vol. 1, 1997, p. 263.
[40] M.M. Ribeiro, P.F. Regueiras, M.M.L. Guimaraes, C.M.N. Madureira, J.J.C. Cruz_Pinto, Optimization of breakage and coalescence model parameters in steady-state batch agitated dispersion, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50(2011) 2182-2191.
[41] M. Laakkonen, V. Alopaeus, J. Aittamaa, Validation of bubble breakage, coalescence and mass transfer models for gas-liquid dispersion in agitated vessel, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61(2006) 218-228.
[42] P.G. Saffman, J.S. Turner, On the collision of droplets in turbulent clouds, J. Fluid Mech. 1(1956) 16-30.
[43] J. Abrahamson, Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid, Chem. Eng. Sci. 30(1975) 1371-1379.
[44] K. Higashitani, K. Yamauchi, Y. Matsuno, G. Hosokawa, Turbulent coagulation of particles dispersed in a viscous fluid, Chem. Eng. J. Jpn. 64(1983) 299-304.
[45] G.H. Golub, J.H. Welsch, Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules, Math. Comput. 23(1969) 221-230.
[46] K. Mohammad, A. Abbas, S.A. Majid, Eulerian-Eulerian two-phase numerical simulation of nanofluid laminar forced convection in a microchannel, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 32(2011) 107-116.