Experimental study of a heavy fuel oil atomization by pressure-swirl injector in the application of entrained flow gasifier

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2018.10.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： The available SMD (Sauter mean diameter) correlations on pressure-swirl injectors predict droplet sizing very different from each other, especially for heavy fuels. Also there was a lack in the literature for comparing available correlations. So an experimental study was conducted on a heavy fuel oil (HFO) spray, Mazut 380. A pressure swirl injector was designed and fabricated. The experiments for Mazut at 40℃ and 80℃ were compared with the results for water, including spray half cone angle, breakup length and mean droplet diameter, at different injection pressures. Lower spray angle, higher breakup length and larger droplets were observed for lower injection pressures and higher liquid viscosity. SMD was about 75 μm for water and about 87 μm for Mazut at 80℃. The results for droplet mean diameter were also compared with correlations from previous studies on pressure swirl atomizers. The SMD results show that for water spray, LISA method was in good agreement, also Babu and Ballester correlations were successful when high viscosity fluid was injected.

关键词: Atomization, Pressure-swirl injector, Mazut, Size distribution, Fuel, Viscosity

Abstract: The available SMD (Sauter mean diameter) correlations on pressure-swirl injectors predict droplet sizing very different from each other, especially for heavy fuels. Also there was a lack in the literature for comparing available correlations. So an experimental study was conducted on a heavy fuel oil (HFO) spray, Mazut 380. A pressure swirl injector was designed and fabricated. The experiments for Mazut at 40℃ and 80℃ were compared with the results for water, including spray half cone angle, breakup length and mean droplet diameter, at different injection pressures. Lower spray angle, higher breakup length and larger droplets were observed for lower injection pressures and higher liquid viscosity. SMD was about 75 μm for water and about 87 μm for Mazut at 80℃. The results for droplet mean diameter were also compared with correlations from previous studies on pressure swirl atomizers. The SMD results show that for water spray, LISA method was in good agreement, also Babu and Ballester correlations were successful when high viscosity fluid was injected.

Key words: Atomization, Pressure-swirl injector, Mazut, Size distribution, Fuel, Viscosity

Pouria Mikaniki, Seyed Mohammad Ali Najafi, Hojat Ghassemi. Experimental study of a heavy fuel oil atomization by pressure-swirl injector in the application of entrained flow gasifier[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2019, 27(4): 765-771.

参考文献

[1] V.B. Garaniya, Modelling of Heavy Fuel Oil Spray Combustion Using Continuous Thermodynamics, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tasmania (Australian Maritime College), 2009.
[2] L. Goldsworthy, Computational fluid dynamics modelling of residual fuel oil combustion in the context of marine diesel engines, Int. J. Engine Res. 7(2) (2006) 181-199.
[3] A. Jasuja, Atomization of crude and residual fuel oils, ASME J. Eng. Power 101(2) (1979) 250-258.
[4] C. Fink, et al., Injection spray analyses from medium speed engines using marine fuels, Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS'08), 2008.
[5] J. Park, J.H. Jang, S. Park, Effect of fuel temperature on heavy fuel oil spray characteristics in a common-rail fuel injection system for marine engines, Ocean Eng. 104(2015) 580-589.
[6] J. Jedelsky, et al., Air-liquid interactions in a pressure-swirl spray, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 121(2018) 788-804.
[7] T. Marchione, et al., Experimental investigation of a pressure swirl atomizer spray, J. Propuls. Power 23(5) (2007) 1096-1101.
[8] M. Rashad, H. Yong, Z. Zekun, Effect of geometric parameters on spray characteristics of pressure swirl atomizers, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41(35) (2016) 15790-15799.
[9] L. Zhou, et al., Sensitivity analysis of heavy fuel oil spray and combustion under lowspeed marine engine-like conditions, Energies 10(8) (2017) 1223.
[10] J.G. Speight, Gasification of Unconventional Feedstocks, Gulf Professional Publishing, USA, 2014.
[11] L. Bayvel, Z. Orzechowski, Liquid Atomization, Combustion:An International Series, Taylor & Francis, UK, 1993.
[12] S.M.A. Najafi, H. Ghassemi, Supercritical water gasification of a heavy fuel oil, Pet. Sci. Technol. 36(9-10) (2018) 675-681.
[13] P. Walzel, Spraying and atomizing of liquids, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 2000.
[14] Z. Han, S. Parrish, P.V. Farrell, R.D. Reitz, Modeling atomization processes of pressure-swirl hollow-cone fuel sprays, Atomization Sprays 7(6) (1997) 663-684.
[15] N. Rizk, A.H. Lefebvre, Internal flow characteristics of simplex swirl atomizers, J. Propuls. Power 1(3) (1985) 193-199.
[16] N. Dombrowski, D. Hasson, The flow characteristics of swirl (centrifugal) spray pressure nozzles with low viscosity liquids, AIChE J. 15(4) (1969) 604-611.
[17] A. Jones, Factors Affecting the Performance of Large Swirl Pressure Jet Atomizers. CEGB Laboratory Note R/M/nl054, 1982.
[18] J. Ballester, C. Dopazo, Discharge coefficient and spray angle measurements for small pressure-swirl nozzles, Atomization Sprays 4(3) (1994) 351-367.
[19] J. Cousin, W. Ren, S. Nally, Transient flows in high pressure swirl injectors, SAE Technical Paper, 1998.
[20] L. Dodge, J. Biaglow, Effect of elevated temperature and pressure on sprays from simplex swirl atomizers, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 108(1) (1986) 209-215.
[21] S. DeCorso, Effect of ambient and fuel pressure on nozzle spray angle, Trans. ASME 79(3) (1957) 607-615.
[22] S. Chen, A. Lefebvre, J. Rollbuhler, Influence of geometric features on the performance of pressure-swirl atomizers, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 112(4) (1990) 579-584.
[23] N. Rizk, A. Lefebvre, Prediction of velocity coefficient and spray cone angle for simplex swirl atomizers, Int. J. Turbo Jet Eng. 4(1-2) (1987) 65-74.
[24] A.H. Lefebvre, V.G. McDonell, Atomization and Sprays, CRC Press, 2017.
[25] B. von Rotz, et al., Evaluation of PDA applicability in regard to heavy fuel oil spray investigations, 17th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 2014.
[26] A. Radcliffe, The performance of a type of swirl atomizer, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 169(1) (1955) 93-106.
[27] K.R. Babu, M. Narasimhan, K. Narayanaswamy, Prediction of mean drop size of fuel sprays from swirl spray atomizers, Int. J. Turbo Jet Eng. 6(1989) 133-141.
[28] J. Kennedy, High Weber number SMD correlations for pressure atomizers, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 108(1) (1986) 191-195.
[29] X. Wang, A. Lefebvre, Mean drop sizes from pressure-swirl nozzles, J. Propuls. Power 3(1) (1987) 11-18.
[30] J. Ballester, C. Dopazo, Drop size measurements in heavy oil sprays from pressureswirl nozzles, Atomization Sprays 6(4) (1996) 377-408.