Solubilization of Phenanthrene and Fluorene in Equimolar Binary Mixtures of Gemini/Conventional Surfactants

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2014.06.028

摘要/Abstract

摘要： This study deals with the enhanced solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as phenanthrene (PHE) and fluorene (FLR) in a pure cationic gemini (G6) and three conventional surfactants [polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether (Brij35), cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS)] as well as in their equimolar binary combinations (G6-Brij35, G6-CTAB and G6-SDS). Their solubilization efficiency toward PHE and FLR has been quantified in terms of the molar solubilization ratio (MSR) and themicelle-water partition coefficient (K_m). The ideality/nonideality of the mixed micelles is discussed with the help of Clint, Rubingh and Rosen's approaches. These theories determine the deviation of experimental critical micelle concentration (CMC) values fromideal criticalmicelle concentration, whichwas measured by evaluating the interaction parameters (β^m and β^σ). Negative values of β^m were observed in all the equimolar binary systems, which show synergismin the mixedmicelles.Whereas at air/liquid interface synergismwas observed in the systems G6-CTAB and G6-Brij35; G6-SDS exhibited an antagonistic effect. The order of MSR and K_m was G6-CTAB N G6-Brij35 N G6-SDS for phenanthrene as well as for fluorene.

关键词: Gemini surfactant, Mixed micelles, Critical micelle concentration, Solubilization, Molar solubilization ratio

Abstract: This study deals with the enhanced solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as phenanthrene (PHE) and fluorene (FLR) in a pure cationic gemini (G6) and three conventional surfactants [polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether (Brij35), cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS)] as well as in their equimolar binary combinations (G6-Brij35, G6-CTAB and G6-SDS). Their solubilization efficiency toward PHE and FLR has been quantified in terms of the molar solubilization ratio (MSR) and themicelle-water partition coefficient (K_m). The ideality/nonideality of the mixed micelles is discussed with the help of Clint, Rubingh and Rosen's approaches. These theories determine the deviation of experimental critical micelle concentration (CMC) values fromideal criticalmicelle concentration, whichwas measured by evaluating the interaction parameters (β^m and β^σ). Negative values of β^m were observed in all the equimolar binary systems, which show synergismin the mixedmicelles.Whereas at air/liquid interface synergismwas observed in the systems G6-CTAB and G6-Brij35; G6-SDS exhibited an antagonistic effect. The order of MSR and K_m was G6-CTAB N G6-Brij35 N G6-SDS for phenanthrene as well as for fluorene.

Key words: Gemini surfactant, Mixed micelles, Critical micelle concentration, Solubilization, Molar solubilization ratio

Huma Siddiqui, Mohammad Kamil, Manorama Panda, Kabir-ud-Din. Solubilization of Phenanthrene and Fluorene in Equimolar Binary Mixtures of Gemini/Conventional Surfactants[J]. , 2014, 22(9): 1009-1015.

参考文献

[1] J.D. Rouse, T. Morita, K. Furukawa, B.-J. Shiau, Solubilization of mixed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon systems using an anionic surfactant, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 325 (2008) 180-185.
[2] J. Santodonato, Review of the estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Relationship to carcinogenicity, Chemosphere 34 (1997) 835-848.
[3] F.P. Koltalo, K. Oukebdane, L. Robin, F. Dionnet, P.L. Desbene, Quantification of volatile PAHs present at trace levels in air flow by aqueous trapping - SPE and HPLC analysis wit fluorometric detection, Talanta 71 (2007) 1825-1833.
[4] D. Grasso, K. Subramaniam, J.J. Pignatello, Y. Yang, D. Ratte, Micellar desorption of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 194 (2001) 65-74.
[5] J.H. Harwell, in: D.A. Sabatini, R.C. Knox (Eds.), Transport and Remediation of Subsurface Contaminants, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 491, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 124-132.
[6] J.C. Fountain, in: D.A. Sabatini, R.C. Knox (Eds.), Transport and Remediation of Subsurface Contaminants, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 491, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 182-191.
[7] B.-J. Shiau, J.D. Rouse, D.A. Sabatini, J.H. Harwell, in: D.A. Sabatini, R.C. Knox, J.H. Harwell (Eds.), Surfactant-Enhanced Subsurface Remediation: Emerging Technologies, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 594, American Chemical Society,Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 65-79.
[8] M. Almgren, F. Grieser, J.K. Thomas, Dynamic and static aspects of solubilization of neutral arenes in ionic micellar solutions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101 (1979) 279-291.
[9] N. Matubayasi, K.K. Liang, M. Nakahara, Free-energy analysis of solubilization in micelle, J. Chem. Phys. 124 (2006) 154908-1-154908-13.
[10] L.L. Schramm, Surfactants: Fundamentals andApplications in the PetroleumIndustry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
[11] J.H. Clint, Micellization of mixed nonionic surface active agents, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 71 (1975) 1327-1334.
[12] D.N. Rubingh, in: K.L. Mittal (Ed.), Solution Chemistry of Surfactants, vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1979, pp. 337-354.
[13] Q. Zhou, M.J. Rosen, Molecular interactions of surfactants in mixed monolayers at the air/aqueous solution interface and in mixed micelles in aqueous media: The regular solution approach, Langmuir 19 (2003) 4555-4562.
[14] F.M. Menger, C.A. Littau, Gemini surfactants: A new class of self-assembling molecules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 10083-10090.
[15] M.J. Rosen, Geminis: A new generation of surfactants, ChemTech 23 (1993) 30-33.
[16] R. Zana, Dimeric and oligomeric surfactants. Behavior at interfaces and in aqueous solution: A review, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 97 (2002) 205-253.
[17] T.A. Camesano, R. Nagarajan, Micelle formation and CMC of gemini surfactants: A thermodynamic model, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 167 (2000) 165-177.
[18] Kabir-ud-Din, M. Shafi, P.A. Bhat, A.A. Dar, Solubilization capabilities of mixtures of cationic Gemini surfactant with conventional cationic, nonionic and anionic surfactants towards polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, J. Hazard. Mater. 167 (2009) 575-581.
[19] Kabir-ud-Din, M.S. Sheikh, A.A. Dar, Analysis of mixed micellar and interfacial behavior of cationic gemini hexanediyl-1,6-bis(dimethylcetylammonium bromide) with conventional ionic and nonionic surfactants in aqueous medium, J. Phys. Chem. B 114 (2010) 6023-6032.
[20] M. Panda, M.S. Sheikh, Kabir-ud-Din, Solubility enhancement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using synergistically interacting gemini-conventional surfactant systems, Z. Phys. Chem. 225 (2011) 427-439.
[21] A. Patist, S.S. Bhagwat, K.W. Penfield, P. Aikens, D.O. Shah, On the measurement of critical micelle concentrations of pure and technical grade non-ionic surfactants, J. Surfactant Deterg. 3 (2000) 53-57.
[22] P.K. Misra, S. Panigrahi, U. Dash, A.B. Mandal, Organization of amphiphiles. Part XI: physico-chemical aspects of mixed micellization involving normal conventional surfactant and a non-ionic gemini surfactant, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 345 (2010) 392-401.
[23] W. Jiang, B. Xu, Q. Lin, J. Li, F. Liu, X. Zeng, H. Chen, Metal promoted hydrolysis of bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphate by trivalent manganese complexes with Schiff base ligands in gemini micellar solution, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 315 (2008) 103-109.
[24] K.J. Rao, S. Paria, Solubilization of naphthalene in the presence of plant-synthetic mixed surfactant systems, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009) 474-481.
[25] M.J. Rosen, Surfactant and Interfacial Phenomena, third ed. JohnWiley & Sons, 2004.
[26] J.L. Li, B.H. Chen, Solubilization of model polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by nonionic surfactants, Chem. Eng. Sci. 118 (2002) 2825-2835.
[27] L. Zhu, S. Feng, Synergistic solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by mixed anionic-nonionic surfactants, Chemosphere 53 (2003) 459-467.
[28] O. Zheng, J.-X. Zhao, Solubilization of pyrene in aqueousmicellar solutions of gemini surfactants C12-s-C12.2Br, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 300 (2006) 749-754.
[29] S. Paria, P.K. Yuet, Solubilization of naphthalene by pure and mixed surfactants, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 3552-3558.
[30] D.A. Edwards, R.G. Luthy, Z. Liu, Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in micellar nonionic surfactant solutions, Environ. Sci. Technol. 25 (1991) 127-133.
[31] J. Wei, G. Huang, H. Yu, C. An, Efficiency of single and mixed gemini/conventional micelles on solubilization of phenanthrene, Chem. Eng. J. 168 (2011) 201-207.
[32] S. Saito, Solubilization properties of polymer-surfactant complexes, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 24 (1967) 227-234.
[33] W. Zhou, L. Zhu, Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by anionic-nonionicmixed surfactant, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 255 (2005) 145-152.
[34] C. Triener, M. Nortz, C. Vaution, Micellar solubilization in strongly interacting binary surfactant systems, Langmuir 6 (1990) 1211-1216.
[35] A.A. Dar, G.M. Rather, A.R. Das, Mixed micelle formation and solubilization behavior toward polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of binary and ternary cationic-nonionic surfactant mixtures, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) 3122-3132.
[36] C.O. Rangel-Yagui, A. Pessoa Jr., L.C. Tavares, Micellar solubilization of drugs, J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 8 (2005) 147-165.