Bubble coalescence efficiency near multi-orifice plate

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2018.11.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Bubble coalescence reduces specific area and weakens the work performance of bubble column. The bubble coalescence near gas sparger which is caused mainly by bubble growing is different from the ones occurring in major liquid. Bubble coalescence efficiency near gas sparger is influenced by many factors including sparger configuration, gas flow rate, bubble deformation, solution composition, etc. This work has conducted a set of visual experiments to study the coalescence characteristics near multi-orifice plate. The experiment parameters cover a wide range of conditions including large scope of gas flow rate, different kinds of solution and orifice configurations. The experimental results suggest that coalescence time is applicable to reflect the influence of the pitch of orifices and gas flow rate on bubble coalescence efficiency. As the number of orifices increases, bubble coalescence efficiency is reduced by the disturbance from the bubbles at adjacent orifices. A hindering coefficient is used to consider the hindering effect of additives on bubble coalescence efficiency. Finally a new calculation expression is established to predict bubble coalescence efficiency near multi-orifice plate whose fundamental form is based on the logistic curve of binary response. The calculated values that refer to this calculation expression are well consistent with the experimental results.

关键词: Bubble column, Bubble coalescence efficiency, Multi-orifice plate, Coalescence time

Abstract: Bubble coalescence reduces specific area and weakens the work performance of bubble column. The bubble coalescence near gas sparger which is caused mainly by bubble growing is different from the ones occurring in major liquid. Bubble coalescence efficiency near gas sparger is influenced by many factors including sparger configuration, gas flow rate, bubble deformation, solution composition, etc. This work has conducted a set of visual experiments to study the coalescence characteristics near multi-orifice plate. The experiment parameters cover a wide range of conditions including large scope of gas flow rate, different kinds of solution and orifice configurations. The experimental results suggest that coalescence time is applicable to reflect the influence of the pitch of orifices and gas flow rate on bubble coalescence efficiency. As the number of orifices increases, bubble coalescence efficiency is reduced by the disturbance from the bubbles at adjacent orifices. A hindering coefficient is used to consider the hindering effect of additives on bubble coalescence efficiency. Finally a new calculation expression is established to predict bubble coalescence efficiency near multi-orifice plate whose fundamental form is based on the logistic curve of binary response. The calculated values that refer to this calculation expression are well consistent with the experimental results.

Key words: Bubble column, Bubble coalescence efficiency, Multi-orifice plate, Coalescence time

Jiming Wen, Qiunan Sun, Zhongning Sun, Haifeng Gu. Bubble coalescence efficiency near multi-orifice plate[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2019, 27(8): 1765-1776.

Jiming Wen, Qiunan Sun, Zhongning Sun, Haifeng Gu. Bubble coalescence efficiency near multi-orifice plate[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(8): 1765-1776.

参考文献

[1] L.S. Fan, K. Tsuchiga, Bubble Wake Dynamics in Liquids and Liquid-Solid Suspensions, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK, 1990.
[2] J. Zhang, L.S. Fan, On the rise velocity of an interactive bubble in liquids, Chem. Eng. J. 92(1-3) (2003) 169-176.
[3] C. Onsafety, Status Report on Filtered Containment Venting, 2014.
[4] M. Jamialahmadi, H. Müuller-Steinhagen, Effect of superficial gas velocity on bubble size, terminal bubble rise velocity and gas hold-up in bubble columns, Dev. Chem. Eng. Miner. Process. (1) (1993) 16-31.
[5] N. Kantarci, F. Borak, K.O.U.B. Ulgen, Bubble column reactors, Process Biochem. (7) (2005) 2263-2283.
[6] V.T. Nguyen et al., Modeling of bubble coalescence and break-up considering turbulent suppression phenomena in bubbly two-phase flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 54(2013) 31-42.
[7] J. Solsvik, H.A. Jakobsen, Development of fluid particle breakup and coalescence closure models for the complete energy spectrum of isotropic turbulence, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(5) (2016) 1449-1460.
[8] Y. Liao, D. Lucas, A literature review on mechanisms and models for the coalescence process of fluid particles, Chem. Eng. Sci. 65(10) (2010) 2851-2864.
[9] N. Yang, Q. Xiao, A mesoscale approach for population balance modeling of bubble size distribution in bubble column reactors, Chem. Eng. Sci. 170(2017) 241-250.
[10] M. Jamialahmadi, H. Müller-Steinhagen, Effect of alcohol, organic acid and potassium chloride concentration on bubble size, bubble rise velocity and gas hold-up in bubble columns, Chem. Eng. J. (1) (1992) 47-56.
[11] M.C. Ruzicka, M.M. Vecer, S. Orvalho, et al., Effect of surfactant on homogeneous regime stability in bubble column, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63(4) (2008) 951-967.
[12] A.A. Mouza, G.K. Dalakoglou, S.V. Paras, Effect of liquid properties on the performance of bubble column reactors with fine pore spargers, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60(5) (2005) 1465-1475.
[13] N.A. Kazakis, A.A. Mouza, S.V. Paras, Coalescence during bubble formation at two neighbouring pores:An experimental study in microscopic scale, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63(21) (2008) 5160-5178.
[14] G. Marrucci, A theory of coalescence, Chem. Eng. Sci. 24(6) (1969) 975-985.
[15] K. Tse, T. Martin, C.M. Mcfarlane, et al., Visualisation of bubble coalescence in a coalescence cell, a stirred tank and a bubble column, Chem. Eng. Sci. 53(23) (1998) 4031-4036.
[16] E.D. Wetzel, C.L. Tucker III, Area tensors for modeling microstructure during laminar liquid-liquid mixing, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25(1) (1999) 35-61.
[17] D. Lhuillier, Evolution of the volumetric interfacial area in two-phase mixtures, C. R. Mécanique 332(2) (2004) 103-108.
[18] G. Tryggvason, M. Ma, J. Lu, DNS assisted modeling of bubbly flows in vertical channels, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 184(3) (2016) 312-320.
[19] M. Ma, J. Lu, G. Tryggvason, Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for bubbly flows in vertical channels, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 85(2016) 336-347.
[20] M. Ma, J. Lu, G. Tryggvason, Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for a simple bubbly system, Phys. Fluids 27(9) (2015) 1-16.
[21] M.J. Prince, H. Blanch, Bubble coalescence and break-up in air sparged biochemical reactors, Electrochim. Acta 49(4) (1990) 515-523.
[22] E. Camarasa, C. Vial, S. Poncin, et al., Influence of coalescence behaviour of the liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 38(4-6) (1999) 329-344.
[23] J.R. Crabtree, J. Bridgwater, Bubble coalescence in viscous liquids, Chem. Eng. Sci. 26(6) (1971) 839-851.
[24] D. Dekée, P.J. Carreau, J. Mordarski, Bubble velocity and coalescence in viscoelastic liquids, Chem. Eng. Sci. 41(9) (1986) 2273-2283.
[25] P. Calderbank, M. Moo-Young, R. Bibby, Coalescence in Bubble Reactors and Absorbers, in:Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Chemical Reaction Engineering, 1964.
[26] J.W. Kim, W.K. Lee, Coalescence behavior of two bubbles in stagnant liquids, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn 20(5) (1987) 448-453.
[27] M. Martín, J.M. Garcia, F.J. Montes, et al., On the effect of the orifice configuration on the coalescence of growing bubbles, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 47(9) (2008) 1799-1809.
[28] R.D. Kirkpatrick, M.J. Lockett, The influence of approach velocity on bubble coalescence, Chem. Eng. Sci. 29(12) (1974) 2363-2373.
[29] P.K. Weissenborn, R.J. Pugh, Surface tension of aqueous solutions of electrolytes:Relationship with ion hydration, oxygen solubility, and bubble coalescence, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 184(2) (1996) 550-563.
[30] J. Wen, H.F. Gu, Z.N. Sun, et al., A theoretical model and experiment validation on filtration characteristics of methyl iodide in bubble column, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 114(2017) 1263-1273.
[31] R.M. Pashley, J.N. Israelachvili, A comparison of surface forces and interfacial properties of mica in purified surfactant solutions, Colloids Surf. 2(2) (1981) 169-187.
[32] U. Hofmeier, V.V. Yaminsky, H.K. Christenson, Observations of solute effects on bubble formation, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 174(1) (1995) 199-210.
[33] V.S.J. Craig, B.W. Ninham, R.M. Pashley, The effect of electrolytes on bubble coalescence in water, J. Phys. Chem. 97(39) (1993) 10192-10197.
[34] G. Marrucci, L. Nicodemo, Coalescence of gas bubbles in aqueous solutions of inorganic electrolytes, Chem. Eng. Sci. 22(9) (1967) 1257-1265.
[35] R. Chhabra, V. Shankar, Coulson and Richardson's Chemical Engineering, 7th edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK, 2017.
[36] Y. Park, A.L. Tyler, N. de Nevers, The chamber orifice interaction in the formation of bubbles, Chem. Eng. Sci. (8) (1977) 907-916.
[37] D.F. Che, J.J.J. Chen, Bubble formation and liquid weeping at an orifice submerged in a liquid, Chem. Ing. Tech. 62(11) (2010) 947-949.
[38] L. Zhang, M. Shoji, Aperiodic bubble formation from a submerged orifice, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56(18) (2001) 5371-5381.
[39] Prince, J. Michael, Blanch, et al., coalescence and break-up in air Sparged bubble columns, AIChE J. 36(10) (2010) 1485-1499.
[40] P.F. Verhulst, Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathematique et Physique Publiee par A Quetelet, Brussels, Quetelet 10(10) (2008) 113-121.
[41] S. Aoyama, K. Hayashi, S. Hosokawa, et al., Shapes of ellipsoidal bubbles in infinite stagnant liquids, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 79(15) (2016) 23-30.
[42] J.B. Shen, L. Wang, Experimental study on the effect of interfacial mass transfer on coalescence of gas bubbles, Chin. J. Process. Eng. 16(2) (2016) 204-209(in Chinese).
[43] E.M. Cachaza, M.E. Diaz, F.J. Montes, et al., Unified study of flow regimes and gas holdup in the presence of positive and negative surfactants in a nonuniformly aerated bubble column, Chem. Eng. Sci. 66(18) (2011) 4047-4058.