The Joule–Thomson effect of (CO2 + H2) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2022.03.017

中国化学工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 215-231.DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.03.017

• Full Length Article • 上一篇下一篇

The Joule–Thomson effect of (CO₂ + H₂) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)

Zhongyao Zhang, Ming Gao, Xiaopeng Chen, Xiaojie Wei, Jiezhen Liang, Chenghong Wu, Linlin Wang

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resources Processing and Process Intensification Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

收稿日期:2021-12-07 修回日期:2022-02-27 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-05-11
通讯作者: Linlin Wang,E-mail:wanglinlin@gxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878056), Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology (2019Z002).

The Joule–Thomson effect of (CO₂ + H₂) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)

Zhongyao Zhang, Ming Gao, Xiaopeng Chen, Xiaojie Wei, Jiezhen Liang, Chenghong Wu, Linlin Wang

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resources Processing and Process Intensification Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

Received:2021-12-07 Revised:2022-02-27 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-05-11
Contact: Linlin Wang,E-mail:wanglinlin@gxu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878056), Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology (2019Z002).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： The Joule–Thomson effect is one of the important thermodynamic properties in the system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS). In this work, a set of apparatus was set up to determine the Joule–Thomson effect of binary mixtures (CO₂ + H₂). The accuracy of the apparatus was verified by comparing with the experimental data of carbon dioxide. The Joule–Thomson coefficients (μ_JT) for (CO₂ + H₂) binary mixtures with mole fractions of carbon dioxide (χ_CO₂ = 0.1, 0.26, 0.5, 0.86, 0.94) along six isotherms at various pressures were measured. Five equations of state EOSs (PR, SRK, PR, BWR and GERG-2008 equation) were used to calculate the μ_JT for both pure systems and binary systems, among which the GERG-2008 predicted best with a wide range of pressure and temperature. Moreover, the Joule–Thomson inversion curves (JTIC) were calculated with five equations of state. A comparison was made between experimental data and predicted data for the inversion curve of CO₂. The investigated EOSs show a similar prediction of the low-temperature branch of the JTIC for both pure and binary systems, except for the BWRS equation of state. Among all the equations, SRK has the most similar result to GERG-2008 for predicting JTIC.

关键词: Carbon dioxide, Hydrogen, Joule–Thomson coefficient, Joule–Thomson inversion curve, Gas switching reforming (GSR), Carbon capture and storage (CCS)

Abstract: The Joule–Thomson effect is one of the important thermodynamic properties in the system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS). In this work, a set of apparatus was set up to determine the Joule–Thomson effect of binary mixtures (CO₂ + H₂). The accuracy of the apparatus was verified by comparing with the experimental data of carbon dioxide. The Joule–Thomson coefficients (μ_JT) for (CO₂ + H₂) binary mixtures with mole fractions of carbon dioxide (χ_CO₂ = 0.1, 0.26, 0.5, 0.86, 0.94) along six isotherms at various pressures were measured. Five equations of state EOSs (PR, SRK, PR, BWR and GERG-2008 equation) were used to calculate the μ_JT for both pure systems and binary systems, among which the GERG-2008 predicted best with a wide range of pressure and temperature. Moreover, the Joule–Thomson inversion curves (JTIC) were calculated with five equations of state. A comparison was made between experimental data and predicted data for the inversion curve of CO₂. The investigated EOSs show a similar prediction of the low-temperature branch of the JTIC for both pure and binary systems, except for the BWRS equation of state. Among all the equations, SRK has the most similar result to GERG-2008 for predicting JTIC.

Key words: Carbon dioxide, Hydrogen, Joule–Thomson coefficient, Joule–Thomson inversion curve, Gas switching reforming (GSR), Carbon capture and storage (CCS)

Zhongyao Zhang, Ming Gao, Xiaopeng Chen, Xiaojie Wei, Jiezhen Liang, Chenghong Wu, Linlin Wang. The Joule–Thomson effect of (CO₂ + H₂) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 54(2): 215-231.

参考文献

[1] G.P. Hu, K.H. Smith, Y. Wu, K.A. Mumford, S.E. Kentish, G.W. Stevens, Carbon dioxide capture by solvent absorption using amino acids: a review, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26 (11) (2018) 2229–2237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.08.003
[2] G.P. Hu, K.H. Smith, Y. Wu, K.A. Mumford, S.E. Kentish, G.W. Stevens, Carbon dioxide capture by solvent absorption using amino acids: a review, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26 (11) (2018) 2229–2237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.08.003
[3] A. Ghanbari, R. Khordad, Influence of potential attraction term on Joule-Thomson coefficient, enthalpy and entropy of real gases, Phys. B Condens. Matter 624 (2022) 413418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2021.413418
[4] J.F. Li, B. Yu, Gas properties, fundamental equations of state and phase relationships. Sustainable Natural Gas Reservoir and Production Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2022(1–28). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-824495-1.00004-8
[5] A. Ugwu, A. Zaabout, S. Amini, An advancement in CO₂ utilization through novel gas switching dry reforming, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 90 (2019) 102791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102791
[6] S. Cloete, L. Hirth, Flexible power and hydrogen production: finding synergy between CCS and variable renewables, Energy 192 (2020) 116671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116671
[7] Voldsund, M., Jordal, K., Anantharaman, R. Hydrogen production with CO₂ capture, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 41(9)(2016)4969-4992.
[8] H. Yu, Recent developments in aqueous ammonia-based post-combustion CO₂ capture technologies, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26 (11) (2018) 2255–2265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.05.024
[9] S.T. Munkejord, M. Hammer, S.W. Løvseth, CO₂ transport: data and models–A review, Appl. Energy 169 (2016) 499–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2016.01.100
[10] Sanchez-Vicente, Y., Drage, T.C., Poliakoff, M., Ke, J., George, M.W. Densities of the carbon dioxide+ hydrogen, a system of relevance to carbon capture and storage, Int J Greenh Gas Con, 13 (2013)78-86.
[11] O. Fandiño, J.P.M. Trusler, D. Vega-Maza, Phase behavior of (CO₂ + H₂) and (CO₂ + N₂) at temperatures between (218.15 and 303.15) K at pressures up to 15 MPa, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 36 (2015) 78–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.018
[12] C.Y. Tsang, W.B. Street, Phase equilibria in the H₂/CO₂ system at temperatures from 220 to 290 K and pressures to 172 MPa, Chem. Eng. Sci. 36 (6) (1981) 993–1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(81)80085-1
[13] H. Mahgerefteh, S. Brown, S. Martynov, A study of the effects of friction, heat transfer, and stream impurities on the decompression behavior in CO₂ pipelines, Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2 (5) (2012) 369–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1302
[14] H.L. Li, Ø. Wilhelmsen, Y.X. Lv, W.L. Wang, J.Y. Yan, Viscosities, thermal conductivities and diffusion coefficients of CO₂ mixtures: review of experimental data and theoretical models, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5 (5) (2011) 1119–1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.07.009
[15] Y.X. Li, S.W. Gu, D.T. Zhang, Q.H. Hu, L. Teng, C.L. Wang, An experimental study on the choked flow characteristics of CO₂ pipelines in various phases, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 32 (2021) 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.09.068
[16] V.A.V.L. Chodankar, Aswatha, K.N. Seetharamu, Improved effectiveness of a cryogenic counter-current parallel flow - Three fluid heat exchanger with three thermal communication due to Joule Thomson pressure drop, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 172 (2022) 107267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107267
[17] Atkins, P., Overton, T. Shriver and Atkins' inorganic chemistry, Oxford University Press, USA, 2010.
[18] K.H. Han, S.P. Noh, I.K. Hong, K.A. Park, Cooling domain prediction of HFCs and HCFCs refrigerant with Joule-Thomson coefficient, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 18 (2) (2012) 617–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.073
[19] R.A. Pierotti, T.R. Rybolt, Statistical thermodynamics of aerosols and the gas-solid Joule-Thomson effect, J. Chem. Phys. 80 (8) (1984) 3826–3830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.447163
[20] I. Marić, The Joule-Thomson effect in natural gas flow-rate measurements, Flow Meas. Instrum. 16 (6) (2005) 387–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2005.04.006
[21] B. Gimeno, M. Artal, I. Velasco, S.T. Blanco, J. Fernández, Influence of SO₂ on CO₂ storage for CCS technology: evaluation of CO₂/SO₂ co-capture, Appl. Energy 206 (2017) 172–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.048
[22] Z. Ziabakhsh-Ganji, H. Kooi, Sensitivity of Joule-Thomson cooling to impure CO₂ injection in depleted gas reservoirs, Appl. Energy 113 (2014) 434–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.059
[23] D. Loeve, C. Hofstee, J.G. Maas, Thermal effects in a depleted gas field by cold CO₂ injection in the presence of methane, Energy Procedia 63 (2014) 5378–5393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.569
[24] F. Kazemifar, D.C. Kyritsis, Experimental investigation of near-critical CO₂ tube-flow and Joule-Thompson throttling for carbon capture and sequestration, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 53 (2014) 161–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.11.026
[25] J.X. Chen, M. Veenstra, J. Purewal, B. Hobein, S. Papasavva, Modeling a hydrogen pressure regulator in a fuel cell system with Joule-Thomson effect, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44 (2) (2019) 1272–1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.020
[26] A. Hosseini, A. Khoshsima, Evaluation of translated-consistent equations of state compared for the prediction of the Joule-Thomson effect at high pressures and high temperatures, Fluid Phase Equilibria 523 (2020) 112775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2020.112775
[27] J.H. Perry, The joule-Thomson effect for helium, J. Phys. Chem. 28 (10) (1924) 1108–1112. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150244a009
[28] T. Regueira, F. Varzandeh, E.H. Stenby, W. Yan, Heat capacity and Joule-Thomson coefficient of selected n-alkanes at 0.1 and 10 MPa in broad temperature ranges, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 111 (2017) 250–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2017.03.034
[29] J.T. Wang, Z.Y. Wang, B.J. Sun, Improved equation of CO₂ Joule-Thomson coefficient, J. CO₂ Util. 19 (2017) 296–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.04.007
[30] J.R. Roebuck, T.A. Murrell, E.E. Miller, The joule-Thomson effect in carbon dioxide, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 64 (2) (1942) 400–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01254a048
[31] D. Price, Thermodynamic functions of carbon dioxide. joule-Thomson coefficient, isochoric heat capacity, and isentropic behavior at 100℃ to 1000° C. and 50 to 1400 bars, Ind. Eng. Chem. Chem. Eng. Data Series 1 (1) (1956) 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/i460001a016
[32] S.R. de Groot, A. Michels, The Joule—Thomson effect and the specific heat at constant pressure of carbon dioxide, Physica 14 (4) (1948) 218–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(48)90039-1
[33] H.J. Ng, A.E. Mather, Isothermal Joule-Thomson coefficients in mixtures of methane and carbon dioxide, J. Chem. Eng. Data 21 (3) (1976) 291–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je60070a001
[34] J.P. Strakey, C.O. Bennett, B.F. Dodge, Joule-Thomson coefficients of argon-carbon dioxide mixtures, AIChE J. 20 (4) (1974) 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690200423
[35] R. Ayber, Joule-Thomson effect in hydrogen-methane mixtures at temperatures between—35 and +40°. Progress in Refrigeration Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1965: 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4831-9857-6.50061-3
[36] R.E. Randelman, L.A. Wenzel, Joule-Thomson coefficients of hydrogen and methane mixtures, J. Chem. Eng. Data 33 (3) (1988) 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00053a021
[37] S.N. Shoghl, A. Naderifar, F. Farhadi, G. Pazuki, Prediction of Joule-Thomson coefficient and inversion curve for natural gas and its components using CFD modeling, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 83 (2020) 103570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103570
[38] Poling, B.E., Prausnitz, J.M., O Connell, J.P. Properties of Gases and Liquids, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2001.
[39] R. Span, W. Wagner, A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 25 (6) (1996) 1509–1596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.555991
[40] D.V. Nichita, C.F. Leibovici, Calculation of Joule-Thomson inversion curves for two-phase mixtures, Fluid Phase Equilibria 246 (1–2) (2006) 167–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2006.05.025
[41] Lemmon, E.W., Huber, M.L., Mclinden, M.O. Nist Standard Reference Database 23: Refprop Version 9.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, Colorado, 2002.
[42] Joint Committee for, Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of the uncertainty in measurement (GUM 1995 with minor corrections), Joint Committee for Guides in, Metrology (2008).
[43] R.C. Ahlert, L.A. Wenzel, Joule-Thomson effects in gas mixtures: the nitrogen-methane-ethane system, AIChE J. 15 (2) (1969) 256–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690150224
[44] M.X. Li, Y.F. Bai, C.Z. Zhang, Y.X. Song, S.F. Jiang, D. Grouset, M.J. Zhang, Review on the research of hydrogen storage system fast refueling in fuel cell vehicle, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44 (21) (2019) 10677–10693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.208
[45] M. Striednig, S. Brandstätter, M. Sartory, M. Klell, Thermodynamic real gas analysis of a tank filling process, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39 (16) (2014) 8495–8509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.028
[46] Y. Kim, D. Shin, C. Kim, On-board cold thermal energy storage system for hydrogen fueling process, Energies 12 (3) (2019) 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030561
[47] M. Kanniche, R. Gros-Bonnivard, P. Jaud, J. Valle-Marcos, J.M. Amann, C. Bouallou, Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO₂ capture, Appl. Therm. Eng. 30 (1) (2010) 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.05.005
[48] N.S. Siefert, S. Litster, Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC-CCS and IGFC-CCS power plants, Appl. Energy 107 (2013) 315–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.006
[49] G.P. Hu, K.H. Smith, Y. Wu, K.A. Mumford, S.E. Kentish, G.W. Stevens, Carbon dioxide capture by solvent absorption using amino acids: a review, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26 (11) (2018) 2229–2237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.08.003
[50] U.K. Deiters, I.H. Bell, Unphysical critical curves of binary mixtures predicted with GERG models, Int. J. Thermophys. 41 (12) (2020) 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02743-3
[51] O. Redlich, J.N.S. Kwong, On the thermodynamics of solutions. V. an equation of state. fugacities of gaseous solutions, Chem. Rev. 44 (1) (1949) 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60137a013
[52] G.M. Wilson, Calculation of enthalpy data from a modified redlich-kwong equation of state. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1966: 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0522-5_43
[53] C.H. Twu, J.E. Coon, J.R. Cunningham, A new generalized alpha function for a cubic equation of state Part 1. Peng-Robinson equation, Fluid Phase Equilibria 105 (1) (1995) 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(94)02601-V
[54] K.E. Starling, M.S. Han, Thermo data refined for LPG. Pt. 15. Industrial applications, Hydrocarbon Process, 51(6) (1972)107-115.
[55] O. Kunz, W. Wagner, The GERG-2008 wide-range equation of state for natural gases and other mixtures: an expansion of GERG-2004, J. Chem. Eng. Data 57 (11) (2012) 3032–3091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je300655b
[56] X.X. Yang, M. Richter, Z. Wang, Z. Li, Density measurements on binary mixtures (nitrogen + carbon dioxide and argon + carbon dioxide) at temperatures from (298.15 to 423.15) K with pressures from (11 to 31) MPa using a single-sinker densimeter, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 91 (2015) 17–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2015.07.014
[57] Lozano-Martin, D., Martín, M.C., Chamorro, C.R., Tuma, D., Segovia, J.J. Speed of sound for three binary (CH₄+ H₂) mixtures from p=(0.5 up to 20) MPa at T=(273.16 to 375) K, Int J Hydrogen Energ, 45(7) (2020)4765-4783.
[58] J. Ke, N. Suleiman, Y. Sanchez-Vicente, T.S. Murphy, J. Rodriguez, A. Ramos, M. Poliakoff, M.W. George, The phase equilibrium and density studies of the ternary mixtures of CO₂ + Ar + N₂ and CO₂ + Ar + H₂, systems relevance to CCS technology, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 56 (2017) 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.003
[59] Deiters, U.K. Comments on the modeling of hydrogen and hydrogen-containing mixtures with cubic equations of state, Fluid Phase Equilibr, 352, (2013)93-96.
[60] Coquelet, C., Chapoy, A., Richon, D. Development of a new alpha function for the Peng–Robinson equation of state: comparative study of alpha function models for pure gases (natural gas components) and water-gas systems, Int J Thermophys, 25(1), (2004)133-158.
[61] F. Varzandeh, E.H. Stenby, W. Yan, Comparison of GERG-2008 and simpler EoS models in calculation of phase equilibrium and physical properties of natural gas related systems, Fluid Phase Equilibria 434 (2017) 21–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.11.016
[62] N.S. Matin, B. Haghighi, Calculation of the Joule-Thomson inversion curves from cubic equations of state, Fluid Phase Equilibria 175 (1–2) (2000) 273–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(00)00443-X
[63] A. Ugwu, A. Zaabout, J.R. Tolchard, P.I. Dahl, S. Amini, Gas Switching Reforming for syngas production with iron-based oxygen carrier-the performance under pressurized conditions, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45 (2) (2020) 1267–1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.191

The Joule–Thomson effect of (CO₂ + H₂) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)

The Joule–Thomson effect of (CO₂ + H₂) binary system relevant to gas switching reforming with carbon capture and storage (CCS)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	Chaojie Li, Xianxin Fang, Meiling Sun, Jihai Duan, Weiwen Wang. Study on two-phase cloud dispersion from liquefied CO₂ release[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 60(8): 37-45.
[2]	Peipei Ai, Huiqing Jin, Jie Li, Xiaodong Wang, Wei Huang. Ultra-stable Cu-based catalyst for dimethyl oxalate hydrogenation to ethylene glycol[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 60(8): 186-193.
[3]	Xiaolin Guo, Zhaoyang Zhang, Pengfei Xing, Shuai Wang, Yibing Guo, Yanxin Zhuang. Kinetic mechanism of copper extraction from methylchlorosilane slurry residue using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 60(8): 228-234.
[4]	Xun Tao, Fan Zhou, Xinlei Yu, Songling Guo, Yunfei Gao, Lu Ding, Guangsuo Yu, Zhenghua Dai, Fuchen Wang. Effect of carbon dioxide on oxy-fuel combustion of hydrogen sulfide: An experimental and kinetic modeling[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 59(7): 105-117.
[5]	Hae-Kyun Park, Dong-Hyuk Park, Bum-Jin Chung. Influence of the electrolyte conductivity on the critical current density and the breakdown voltage[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 59(7): 169-175.
[6]	Zhonghao Li, Yuanyuan Yang, Huanong Cheng, Yun Teng, Chao Li, Kangkang Li, Zhou Feng, Hongwei Jin, Xinshun Tan, Shiqing Zheng. Measurement and model of density, viscosity, and hydrogen sulfide solubility in ferric chloride/trioctylmethylammonium chloride ionic liquid[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 59(7): 210-221.
[7]	Qunfeng Zhang, Bingcheng Li, Yuan Zhou, Deshuo Zhang, Chunshan Lu, Feng Feng, Jinghui Lv, Qingtao Wang, Xiaonian Li. Regulation of the selective hydrogenation performance of sulfur-doped carbon-supported palladium on chloronitrobenzene[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 58(6): 69-75.
[8]	Bin Gao, Junwen Chen, Qi Zuo, Hongyan Wang, Wenlin Li. The critical role of Zr in controlling the activity of Pd/Beta on the hydrogenation of phenol to cyclohexanone[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 57(5): 79-87.
[9]	Yunchang Fan, Chunyan Zhu, Sheli Zhang, Lei Zhang, Qiang Wang, Feng Wang. Efficient and selective extraction of sinomenine by deep eutectic solvents[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 57(5): 109-117.
[10]	Qi Yang, Weikang Dai, Maoshuai Li, Jie Wei, Yi Feng, Cheng Yang, Wanxin Yang, Ying Zheng, Jie Ding, Mei-Yan Wang, Xinbin Ma. Enhanced selective hydrogenation of glycolaldehyde to ethylene glycol over Cu⁰-Cu⁺ sites[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 57(5): 141-150.
[11]	Shujun Peng, Song Lei, Sisi Wen, Jian Xue, Haihui Wang. A Ruddlesden–Popper oxide as a carbon dioxide tolerant cathode for solid oxide fuel cells that operate at intermediate temperatures[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 56(4): 25-32.
[12]	Chao Yang, Zhelin Su, Yeshuang Wang, Huiling Fan, Meisheng Liang, Zhaohui Chen. Insight into the effect of gel drying temperature on the structure and desulfurization performance of ZnO/SiO₂ adsorbents[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 56(4): 233-241.
[13]	Tatyana P. Adamova, Sergey S. Skiba, Andrey Yu. Manakov, Sergey Y. Misyura. Growth rate of CO₂ hydrate film on water–oil and water–gaseous CO₂ interface[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 56(4): 266-272.
[14]	Qiaoqiao Liu, Guihong Lin, Jian Zhou, Liangliang Huang, Chang Liu. Hydrogen-bond mediated and concentrate-dependent NaHCO₃ crystal morphology in NaHCO₃–Na₂CO₃ aqueous solution: Experiments and computer simulations[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 55(3): 49-58.
[15]	Bowen Jiang, Jia Liu, Guoqiang Yang, Zhibing Zhang. Efficient conversion of CO₂ into cyclic carbonates under atmospheric by halogen and metal-free poly(ionic liquid)s[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 55(3): 202-211.