Separation of a C3H6/C2H4 mixture using Pebax® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2022.03.008

中国化学工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 192-198.DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.03.008

• Full Length Article • 上一篇下一篇

Separation of a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ mixture using Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes

Xi Zhang¹, Xiaodong Wang¹, Wei Huang^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Clean and Efficient Coal Utilization, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
2. Taiyuan Coal Conversion Technology Engineering Co., Ltd, Taiyuan 030024, China

收稿日期:2021-11-08 修回日期:2022-03-13 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-05-11
通讯作者: Xiaodong Wang,E-mail:wangxiaodong@tyut.edu.cn;Wei Huang,E-mail:huangwei@tyut.edu.cn
基金资助:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB0606405), the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (20210302123197), the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21336006), the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars of Ministry of Education (2017-047), and the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering (2017-K15).

Separation of a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ mixture using Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes

Xi Zhang¹, Xiaodong Wang¹, Wei Huang^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Clean and Efficient Coal Utilization, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
2. Taiyuan Coal Conversion Technology Engineering Co., Ltd, Taiyuan 030024, China

Received:2021-11-08 Revised:2022-03-13 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-05-11
Contact: Xiaodong Wang,E-mail:wangxiaodong@tyut.edu.cn;Wei Huang,E-mail:huangwei@tyut.edu.cn
Supported by:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB0606405), the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (20210302123197), the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21336006), the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars of Ministry of Education (2017-047), and the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering (2017-K15).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： In industry, ethylene (C₂H₄)/propylene (C₃H₆) separations are usually performed by a cryogenic process, which is energy intensive. Membrane separation technology is an alternative separation process that saves energy and is efficient. In this study, blend membranes were prepared by doping polyethylene glycol (PEG600) into a poly(ether-block-amide) (Pebax^® 2533) matrix and were used to separate the C₂H₄/C₃H₆ mixture. The PEG 600 and Pebax^® 2533 polymers have good compatibility because they share hydrogen bonds. The addition of PEG600 is conducive to the hydrophilicity and the free volume of blend membranes, and it is also conducive to the solubility of C₂H₄ and C₃H₆ in the membranes, which improves the ability of the membranes to separate this gas pair. The Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membrane with 15% (mass) PEG600 showed the highest separation performance in our investigated membranes, with a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ selectivity of 8.9 and a C₃H₆ permeability of 196 barrer (1 barrer = 1.33×10¹⁴ m³(STP)·m·m^-2·s^-1·kPa^-1) at 238 K and 0.2 MPa, which is higher than that of the Pebax^® 2533/NaY-6% (mass) membrane (α_{C₃H₆=C₂H₄} =6.5, =211 barrer) reported in our previous work. It is confirmed that incorporating PEG600 into the Pebax^® 2533 matrix to fabricate blend membranes is an efficient strategy for separating light olefins.

关键词: Ethylene/propylene separation, Blend membranes, Pebax^® 2533, PEG600

Abstract: In industry, ethylene (C₂H₄)/propylene (C₃H₆) separations are usually performed by a cryogenic process, which is energy intensive. Membrane separation technology is an alternative separation process that saves energy and is efficient. In this study, blend membranes were prepared by doping polyethylene glycol (PEG600) into a poly(ether-block-amide) (Pebax^® 2533) matrix and were used to separate the C₂H₄/C₃H₆ mixture. The PEG 600 and Pebax^® 2533 polymers have good compatibility because they share hydrogen bonds. The addition of PEG600 is conducive to the hydrophilicity and the free volume of blend membranes, and it is also conducive to the solubility of C₂H₄ and C₃H₆ in the membranes, which improves the ability of the membranes to separate this gas pair. The Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membrane with 15% (mass) PEG600 showed the highest separation performance in our investigated membranes, with a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ selectivity of 8.9 and a C₃H₆ permeability of 196 barrer (1 barrer = 1.33×10¹⁴ m³(STP)·m·m^-2·s^-1·kPa^-1) at 238 K and 0.2 MPa, which is higher than that of the Pebax^® 2533/NaY-6% (mass) membrane (α_{C₃H₆=C₂H₄} =6.5, =211 barrer) reported in our previous work. It is confirmed that incorporating PEG600 into the Pebax^® 2533 matrix to fabricate blend membranes is an efficient strategy for separating light olefins.

Key words: Ethylene/propylene separation, Blend membranes, Pebax^® 2533, PEG600

Xi Zhang, Xiaodong Wang, Wei Huang. Separation of a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ mixture using Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 54(2): 192-198.

Xi Zhang, Xiaodong Wang, Wei Huang. Separation of a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ mixture using Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, 54(2): 192-198.

参考文献

[1] C.H. Park, J.H. Lee, J.P. Jung, J.H. Kim, Mixed matrix membranes based on dual-functional MgO nanosheets for olefin/paraffin separation, J. Membr. Sci. 533 (2017) 48–56.
[2] J.J. Hou, P.C. Liu, M. Jiang, L. Yu, L.S. Li, Z.Y. Tang, Olefin/paraffin separation through membranes: From mechanisms to critical materials, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (41) (2019) 23489–23511.
[3] Y.X. Ren, X. Liang, H.Z. Dou, C.M. Ye, Z.Y. Guo, J.Y. Wang, Y.C. Pan, H. Wu, M.D. Guiver, Z.Y. Jiang, Membrane-based olefin/paraffin separations, Adv. Sci. 7 (19) (2020) 2001398.
[4] A. Campos, R.A. dos Reis, A. Ortiz, D. Gorri, I. Ortiz, A perspective of solutions for membrane instabilities in olefin/paraffin separations: A review, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.57 (31) (2018) 10071–10085.
[5] A.H. Assen, Y. Belmabkhout, K. Adil, P.M.Bhatt, D.X. Xue, H. Jiang, M. Eddaoudi, Ultra-tuning of the rare-earth fcu-MOF aperture size for selective molecular exclusion of branched paraffins, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (48) (2015) 14353–14358.
[6] L.B. Li, H.M. Wen, C.H. He, R.B. Lin, R. Krishna, H. Wu, W. Zhou, J.P. Li, B. Li, B.L. Chen, A metal–organic framework with suitable pore size and specific functional sites for the removal of trace propyne from propylene, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (46) (2018) 15183–15188.
[7] W. Su, A. Zhang, Y. Sun, M. Ran, X.J. Wang, Adsorption properties of C₂H₄ and C₃H₆ on 11 adsorbents, J. Chem. Eng. Data 62 (1) (2017) 417–421.
[8] M. Naghsh, M. Sadeghi, A. Moheb, M.P. Chenar, M. Mohagheghian, Separation of ethylene/ethane and propylene/propane by cellulose acetate-silica nanocomposite membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 423-424 (2012) 97–106.
[9] Y.X. Wang, S.B. Peh, D. Zhao, Alternatives to cryogenic distillation: Advanced porous materials in adsorptive light olefin/paraffin separations, Small 15 (25) (2019) 1900058.
[10] P. Su, Membrane technology for use in a methanol-to-propylene conversion process, U.S. Pat., US09205380B2 (2015).
[11] D.M. Zhang, Review of separation process for methanol to olefins, Chem. Ind. 30 (6)(2012) 12–17.
[12] D.F. Sanders, Z.P. Smith, R.L. Guo, L.M. Robeson, J.E. McGrath, D.R. Paul, B.D. Freeman, Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: A review, Polymer 54 (18) (2013) 4729–4761.
[13] C.Z. Liang, T.S. Chung, J.Y. Lai, A review of polymeric composite membranes for gas separation and energy production, Prog. Polym. Sci. 97 (2019) 101141.
[14] Y.C. Liu, J.X. Zhang, X.Y. Tan, High performance of PIM-1/ZIF-8 composite membranes for O₂/N₂ separation, ACS Omega 4 (15) (2019) 16572–16577.
[15] C.H. Pian, J. Shen, G.P. Liu, Z.K. Liu, W.Q. Jin, Ceramic hollow fiber-supported PDMS composite membranes for oxygen enrichment from air, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 11 (3) (2016) 460–466.
[16] J. Poudel, J. Choi, S. Oh, Process design characteristics of syngas (CO/H₂) separation using composite membrane, Sustainability 11 (3) (2019) 703.
[17] M.Z. Ahmad, T.A. Peters, N.M. Konnertz, T. Visser, C. Téllez, J. Coronas, V. Fila, W.M. de Vos, N.E. Benes, High-pressure CO₂/CH₄ separation of Zr-MOFs based mixed matrix membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 230 (2020) 115858.
[18] M. Isanejad, N. Azizi, T. Mohammadi, Pebax membrane for CO₂/CH₄ separation: Effects of various solvents on morphology and performance,J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 134 (9) (2017)44531.
[19] L. Yu, M.S. Nobandegani, J. Hedlund, Industrially relevant CHA membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation, J. Membr. Sci. 641 (2022) 119888.
[20] D.H. Liu, L. Xiang, H. Chang, K. Chen, C.Q. Wang, Y.C. Pan, Y.S. Li, Z.Y. Jiang, Rational matching between MOFs and polymers in mixed matrix membranes for propylene/propane separation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 204 (2019) 151–160.
[21] X.Y. Chen, A.G. Xiao, D. Rodrigue, Polymer-based membranes for propylene/propane separation, Sep. Purif. Rev. 51 (1) (2022) 130–142.
[22] Z.Y. Wang, W.J. Wang, T. Zeng, D. Ma, P.P. Zhang, S.Q. Zhao, L. Yang, X.Q. Zou, G.S. Zhu, Covalent-linking-enabled superior compatibility of ZIF-8 hybrid membrane for efficient propylene separation, Adv. Mater. 34 (6) (2022) e2104606.
[23] Y.C. Pan, Z.P. Lai, Sharp separation of C₂/C₃ hydrocarbon mixtures by zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) membranes synthesized in aqueous solutions, Chem. Commun. 47 (37) (2011) 10275–10277.
[24] X. Zhang, M.Y. Yan, X.S. Feng, X.D. Wang, W. Huang, Ethylene/propylene separation using mixed matrix membranes of poly (ether block amide)/nano-zeolite (NaY or NaA), Korean J. Chem. Eng. 38 (3) (2021) 576–586.
[25] W.H. Lee, J.G. Seong, J.Y. Bae, H.H. Wang, S.J. Moon, J.T. Jung, Y.S. Do, H. Kang, C.H. Park, Y.M. Lee, Thermally rearranged semi-interpenetrating polymer network (TR-SIPN) membranes for gas and olefin/paraffin separation, J. Membr. Sci. 625 (2021) 119157.
[26] S.H. Choi, J.H. Kim, S.B. Lee, Sorption and permeation behaviors of a series of olefins and nitrogen through PDMS membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 299 (1–2) (2007) 54–62.
[27] L. Liu, A. Chakma, X.S. Feng, Sorption, diffusion, and permeation of light olefins in poly(ether block amide) membranes, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61 (18) (2006) 6142–6153.
[28] P. Li, T.S. Chung, D.R. Paul, Gas sorption and permeation in PIM-1, J. Membr. Sci. 432 (2013) 50–57.
[29] J. Ravi, M.H.D. Othman, T. Matsuura, M. Ro'il Bilad, T.H. El-badawy, F. Aziz, A.F. Ismail, M.A. Rahman, J. Jaafar, Polymeric membranes for desalination using membrane distillation: A review, Desalination 490 (2020) 114530.
[30] Z.C. Zhang, C.G. Guo, J.L. Lv, Tributyl citrate as diluent for preparation of PVDFporous membrane via thermally induced phase separation, Polym. Polym. Compos. 23 (3) (2015) 175–180.
[31] W.F. Yong, H. Zhang, Recent advances in polymer blend membranes for gas separation and pervaporation, Prog. Mater. Sci. 116 (2021) 100713.
[32] A. Mahmoudi, M. Asghari, V. Zargar, CO₂/CH₄ separation through a novel commercializable three-phase PEBA/PEG/NaX nanocomposite membrane, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 23 (2015) 238–242.
[33] N. Azizi, T. Mohammadi, R.M. Behbahani, Synthesis of a new nanocomposite membrane (PEBAX-1074/PEG-400/TiO₂) in order to separate CO₂ from CH₄, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 37 (2017) 39–51.
[34] N. Azizi, M.R. Hojjati, M.M. Zarei, Study of CO₂ and CH₄ permeation properties through prepared and characterized blended pebax-2533/PEG-200 membranes, Silicon 10 (4) (2018) 1461–1467.
[35] E. Aionicesei, M. Škerget, Ž. Knez, Measurement and modeling of the CO₂ solubility in poly(ethylene glycol) of different molecular weights, J. Chem. Eng. Data53 (1) (2008) 185–188.
[36] A. Car, C. Stropnik, W. Yave, K.V. Peinemann, PEG modified poly(amide-b-ethylene oxide) membranes for CO₂ separation, J. Membr. Sci. 307 (1) (2008) 88–95.
[37] L.L. Dong, C.F. Zhang, Y.X. Bai, D.J. Shi, X.J. Li, H.J. Zhang, M.Q. Chen, High-performance PEBA2533-functional MMT mixed matrix membrane containing high-speed facilitated transport channels for CO₂/N₂ separation, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 4 (6) (2016) 3486–3496.
[38] L. Liu, A. Chakma, X.S. Feng, A novel method of preparing ultrathin poly(ether block amide) membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 235 (1–2) (2004) 43–52.
[39] Y. Kamiya, Y. Naito, K. Mizoguchi, K. Terada, J. Moreau, Thermodynamic interactions in rubbery polymer/gas systems, J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 35 (7) (1997) 1049–1053.
[40] S.R. Reijerkerk, K. Nijmeijer, C.P. Ribeiro Jr, B.D. Freeman, M. Wessling, On the effects of plasticization in CO₂/light gas separation using polymeric solubility selective membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 367 (1–2) (2011) 33–44.
[41] S.C. Feng, J.Z. Ren, D. Zhao, H. Li, K.S. Hua, X.X. Li, M.C. Deng, Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) molecular weight on CO₂/N₂ separation performance of poly(amide-12-b-ethylene oxide)/poly(ethylene glycol) blend membranes, J. Energy Chem. 28 (2019) 39–45.
[42] H. Sanaeepur, A. Ebadi Amooghin, A. Moghadassi, A. Kargari, S. Moradi, D. Ghanbari, A novel acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene/poly(ethylene glycol) membrane: Preparation, characterization, and gas permeation study, Polym. Adv. Technol. 23 (8) (2012) 1207–1218.
[43] P. Taheri, A. Raisi, M.S. Maleh, CO₂-selective poly (ether-block-amide)/polyethylene glycol composite blend membrane for CO₂ separation from gas mixtures, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (28) (2021) 38274–38291.
[44] S.C. Feng, J.Z. Ren, K.S. Hua, H. Li, X.L. Ren, M.C. Deng, Poly(amide-12-b-ethylene oxide)/polyethylene glycol blend membranes for carbon dioxide separation, Sep. Purif. Technol. 116 (2013) 25–34.
[45] M. Pazirofteh, M. Abdolmajidi, M. Samipoorgiri, M. Dehghani, A.H. Mohammadi, Separation and transport specification of a novel PEBA-1074/PEG-400/TiO₂ nanocomposite membrane for light gas separation: Molecular simulation study, J. Mol. Liq. 291 (2019) 111268.
[46] A. Droudian, M. Lokesh, S.K. Youn, H.G. Park, Gas concentration polarization and transport mechanism transition near thin polymeric membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 567 (2018) 1–6.
[47] G.H. He, Y.L. Mi, P. Lock Yue, G.H. Chen, Theoretical study on concentration polarization in gas separation membrane processes, J. Membr. Sci.153 (2) (1999) 243–258.
[48] J.E. Shin, S.K. Lee, Y.H. Cho, H.B. Park, Effect of PEG-MEA and graphene oxide additives on the performance of Pebax^®1657 mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation, J. Membr. Sci.572 (2019) 300–308.
[49] M. Rao, S. Sircar, T.C. Golden, Gas separation by adsorbent membranes, U.S. Pat., 724063, 1991.
[50] S. Sircar, A.L. Myers, Gas separation by zeolites,Handbook of zolite science and technology, 2003.
[51] S.S. Zhao, J.Y. Liao, D.F. Li, X.D. Wang, N.W. Li, Blending of compatible polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) with Tröger's Base polymer for gas separation membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 566 (2018) 77–86.
[52] X.R. Zhang, T. Zhang, Y.H. Wang, J.P. Li, C.C. Liu, N.W. Li, J.Y. Liao, Mixed-matrix membranes based on Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-PEBA for high performance CO₂ separation, J. Membr. Sci. 560 (2018) 38–46.
[53] W.D. Fan, X. Wang, X.R. Zhang, X.P. Liu, Y.T. Wang, Z.X. Kang, F.N. Dai, B. Xu, R.M. Wang, D.F. Sun, Fine-tuning the pore environment of the microporous Cu-MOF for high propylene storage and efficient separation of light hydrocarbons, ACS Cent. Sci. 5 (7) (2019) 1261–1268.

Separation of a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ mixture using Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes

Separation of a C₃H₆/C₂H₄ mixture using Pebax^® 2533/PEG600 blend membranes

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价