Investigation on catalytic distillation for ethyl acetate production with different catalytic packing structures

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2022.02.012

Abstract

Abstract: The catalytic packing is the core component of the catalytic distillation, and how the catalyst exists in the packing has significant influence on the process. To investigate the effect of catalyst packings on the catalytic distillation process, the classical ethyl acetate reactive distillation system was utilized, and a supported catalytic packing (SCP) was prepared in comparison with the conventional tea-bag catalytic packing (TBP). Laboratory scale experiments showed that the ethyl acetate conversion of the SCP was superior to the TBP at a low catalyst loading. The effects of reaction kinetics, mass transfer performance and actual catalytic efficiency of the packings on this process were regarded as reasons and studied by combining the experiments and numerical simulation. Results suggested that the relatively immediate “in-situ separation” caused by the rapid reaction kinetics and better mass transfer performance of SCP may be a main reason for the difference of the conversion.

Key words: Catalytic packing, Ethyl acetate, Catalytic distillation, Mass transfer, Esterification, Reaction kinetics

摘要： The catalytic packing is the core component of the catalytic distillation, and how the catalyst exists in the packing has significant influence on the process. To investigate the effect of catalyst packings on the catalytic distillation process, the classical ethyl acetate reactive distillation system was utilized, and a supported catalytic packing (SCP) was prepared in comparison with the conventional tea-bag catalytic packing (TBP). Laboratory scale experiments showed that the ethyl acetate conversion of the SCP was superior to the TBP at a low catalyst loading. The effects of reaction kinetics, mass transfer performance and actual catalytic efficiency of the packings on this process were regarded as reasons and studied by combining the experiments and numerical simulation. Results suggested that the relatively immediate “in-situ separation” caused by the rapid reaction kinetics and better mass transfer performance of SCP may be a main reason for the difference of the conversion.

关键词: Catalytic packing, Ethyl acetate, Catalytic distillation, Mass transfer, Esterification, Reaction kinetics

Zhiwei Wang, Yu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Daowei Zhou, Zhikai Cao, Yong Sha. Investigation on catalytic distillation for ethyl acetate production with different catalytic packing structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, 53(1): 63-72.

References

[1] A.A. Kiss, M. Jobson, X. Gao, Reactive distillation: Stepping up to the next level of process intensification, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58 (15) (2019) 5909–5918.
[2] J.J. Liu, B.L. Yang, Liquid–liquid–solid mass transfer and phase behavior of heterogeneous etherification of glycerol with isobutene, AIChE J. 64 (7) (2018) 2526–2535.
[3] P.W.A.M. Wenmakers, J. van der Schaaf, B.F.M. Kuster, J.C. Schouten, Liquid–solid mass transfer for cocurrent gas–liquid upflow through solid foam packings, AIChE J. 56 (11) (2010) 2923–2933.
[4] N. Bekiaris, G.A. Meski, C.M. Radu, M. Morari, Multiple steady states in homogeneous azeotropic distillation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32 (9) (1993) 2023–2038.
[5] K. Sundmacher, G. Uhde, U. Hoffmann, Multiple reactions in catalytic distillation processes for the production of the fuel oxygenates MTBE and TAME: Analysis by rigorous model and experimental validation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54 (13–14) (1999) 2839–2847.
[6] Q.L. Wang, C. Yang, H.X. Wang, T. Qiu, Optimization of process-specific catalytic packing in catalytic distillation process: A multi-scale strategy, Chem. Eng. Sci. 174 (2017) 472–486.
[7] X.G. Li, H. Zhang, X. Gao, R. Zhang, H. Li, Hydrodynamic simulations of seepage catalytic packing internal for catalytic distillation column, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (43) (2012) 14236–14246.
[8] C.N. Dai, Z.G. Lei, Q.S. Li, B.H. Chen, Pressure drop and mass transfer study in structured catalytic packings, Sep. Purif. Technol. 98 (2012) 78–87.
[9] H.D. Ding, J.M. Li, W.Y. Xiang, C.J. Liu, CFD simulation and optimization of winpak-based modular catalytic structured packing, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 (8) (2015) 2391–2403.
[10] Q.L. Wang, F.Y. Zhang, R. Huang, X.D. Wang, C. Yang, H.X. Wang, T. Qiu, Multiphase flow and multicomponent reactive transport study in the catalyst layer of structured catalytic packings for the direct hydration of cyclohexene, Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 158 (2020) 108199.
[11] L. Götze, O. Bailer, P. Moritz, C. von Scala, Reactive distillation with KATAPAK^®, Catal. Today 69 (1–4) (2001) 201–208.
[12] X. Gao, F.Z. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Li, X.G. Li, Liquid flow behavior of a seepage catalytic packing internal for catalytic distillation column, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (32) (2014) 12793–12801.
[13] X. Gao, Q.Y. Ding, Y. Wu, Y.L. Jiao, J.S. Zhang, X.G. Li, H. Li, Kinetic study of esterification over structured ZSM-5-coated catalysts based on fluid flow situations in macrocellular foam materials, React. Chem. Eng. 5 (3) (2020) 485–494.
[14] T. Deng, Y.K. Li, G.F. Zhao, Z.Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Lu, Catalytic distillation for ethyl acetate synthesis using microfibrous-structured Nafion–SiO₂/SS-fiber solid acid packings, React. Chem. Eng. 1 (4) (2016) 409–417.
[15] K. Sundmacher, U. Hoffmann, Multicomponent mass and energy transport on different length scales in a packed reactive distillation column for heterogeneously catalysed fuel ether production, Chem. Eng. Sci. 49 (24) (1994) 4443–4464.
[16] X. Gao, P. Yan, X.H. Ma, Z.Y. Zhao, H. Li, X.G. Li, Design of distillation reactor with novel catalysts distribution pattern for n-amyl acetate synthesis in industrial scale, Fuel 280 (2020) 118604.
[17] Y.L. Jiao, C.H. Jiang, Z.M. Yang, J. Liu, J.S. Zhang, Synthesis of highly accessible ZSM-5 coatings on SiC foam support for MTP reaction, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 181 (2013) 201–207.
[18] Y.T. Tang, Y.W. Chen, H.P. Huang, C.C. Yu, S.B. Hung, M.J. Lee, Design of reactive distillations for acetic acid esterification, AIChE J. 51 (6) (2005) 1683–1699.
[19] J.C. Ye, J. Li, Y. Sha, Y.L. Xu, D.W. Zhou, Novel reactive distillation process for phenol production with a dry cation exchange resin as the catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (32) (2014) 12614–12621.
[20] F. Reepmeyer, J.U. Repke, G. Wozny, Time optimal start-up strategies for reactive distillation columns, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (20) (2004) 4339–4347.
[21] H.X. Wu, Z.G. Tang, H. Hu, C. Quan, H.H. Song, S.Y. Li, Predictions for start-up processes of reactive distillation column via artificial neural network, Chem. Eng. Technol. 29 (6) (2006) 744–749.
[22] R.L.N. de la Fuente, A.F. Tlacuahuac, Optimal start-up and product transition policies of a reactive distillation column, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (7) (2007) 2092–2111.
[23] T. Keller, J. Muendges, A. Jantharasuk, C.A. Gónzalez-Rugerio, H. Moritz, P. Kreis, A. Górak, Experimental model validation for n-propyl propionate synthesis in a reactive distillation column coupled with a liquid–liquid phase separator, Chem. Eng. Sci. 66 (20) (2011) 4889–4900.
[24] N. Calvar, B. González, A. Dominguez, Esterification of acetic acid with ethanol: Reaction kinetics and operation in a packed bed reactive distillation column, Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 46 (12) (2007) 1317–1323.
[25] I.K. Lai, Y.C. Liu, C.C. Yu, M.J. Lee, H.P. Huang, Production of high-purity ethyl acetate using reactive distillation: Experimental and start-up procedure, Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 47 (9–10) (2008) 1831–1843.
[26] K. Sundmacher, H. Künne, U. Kunz, Contribution of gel phase diffusion to mass transfer in supported ion exchange catalysts, Chem. Eng. Technol. 21 (6) (1998) 494–498.
[27] Y.Y. Zhuo, Y.X. Zhong, Y.L. Xu, Y. Sha, Evaluation of transfer resistances in the reactive distillation process for phenol production, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55 (1) (2016) 257–266.
[28] P. Moritz, H. Hasse, Fluid dynamics in reactive distillation packing Katapak^®-S, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54 (10) (1999) 1367–1374.
[29] Z. Fan, K. Liu, G.J. Qi, R. Frimpong, H. Nikolic, K.L. Liu, Aspen modeling for MEA–CO₂ loop: Dynamic gridding for accurate column profile, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 37 (2015) 318–324.
[30] Y. Wu, Study of catalytic distillation hydrolysis of methyl acetate in a pilot plant, Ph. D. Thesis, Zhejiang Univ., China, 1999.
[31] K. Onda, H. Takeuchi, Y. Okumoto, Mass transfer coefficients between gas and liquid phases in packed columns, J. Chem. Eng. Japan 1 (1) (1968) 56–62.
[32] R. Billet, M. Schultes, Prediction of mass transfer columns with dumped and arranged packings: Updated summary of the calculation method of Billet and Schultes, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 77 (6) (1999) 498–504.
[33] R.E. Tsai, A.F. Seibert, R.B. Eldridge, G.T. Rochelle, A dimensionless model for predicting the mass-transfer area of structured packing, AIChE J. 57 (5) (2011) 1173–1184.
[34] C.R. Wilke, P. Chang, Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions, AIChE J. 1 (2) (1955) 264–270.
[35] T.H. Chilton, A.P. Colburn, Mass transfer (absorption) coefficients prediction from data on heat transfer and fluid friction, Ind. Eng. Chem. 26 (11) (1934) 1183–1187.
[36] P.N. Dwivedi, S.N. Upadhyay, Particle-fluid mass transfer in fixed and fluidized beds, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 16 (2) (1977) 157–165.
[37] A. Hoffmann, C. Noeres, A. Górak, Scale-up of reactive distillation columns with catalytic packings, Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 43 (3) (2004) 383–395.
[38] S. Ratheesh, A. Kannan, Holdup and pressure drop studies in structured packings with catalysts, Chem. Eng. J. 104 (1–3) (2004) 45–54.
[39] T. Deng, J. Ding, G.F. Zhao, Y. Liu, Y. Lu, Catalytic distillation for esterification of acetic acid with ethanol: Promising SS-fiber@HZSM-5 catalytic packings and experimental optimization via response surface methodology, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 93 (3) (2018) 827–841.
[40] T. Deng, G.F. Zhao, Y. Liu, Y. Lu, Catalytic distillation for one-step cyclohexyl acetate production and cyclohexene-cyclohexane separation via esterification of cyclohexene with acetic acid over microfibrous-structured Nafion-SiO₂/SS-fiber packings, Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 131 (2018) 215–226.