Coordinating and Evaluating of Multiple Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Equipment: Case Study of Distillation Column

doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2014.05.007

›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7): 805-811.DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.05.007

• PROCESS MONITOR • 上一篇下一篇

Coordinating and Evaluating of Multiple Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Equipment: Case Study of Distillation Column

Li Zhu, Hongye Su, Shan Lu, YueWang, Quanling Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Institute of Cyber-Systems and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

收稿日期:2013-05-01 修回日期:2014-03-03 出版日期:2014-07-28 发布日期:2014-08-23
通讯作者: Hongye Su
基金资助:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61134007, 61320106009).

Coordinating and Evaluating of Multiple Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Equipment: Case Study of Distillation Column

Li Zhu, Hongye Su, Shan Lu, YueWang, Quanling Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Institute of Cyber-Systems and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Received:2013-05-01 Revised:2014-03-03 Online:2014-07-28 Published:2014-08-23
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61134007, 61320106009).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Manufacturing equipment takes the task of operation and directly effects on the manufacturing process. One single Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is mainly employed to evaluate equipment inmost studies, neither integrating the KPIs into a completed evaluation system nor considering the impact and conflict among KPIs. In this paper, a KPI evaluation architecture is presented to define and analyze KPIs, and then a common structure for KPI to obtain the KPI set of manufacturing equipment is introduced. An available multi-KPI coordination model is proposed to discern and balance the relationship amongmulti-KPI. Finally, a case study is introduced to illustrate the applicability of the coordination model by using multi-objective optimization strategy and an efficient solution is obtained.

关键词: Key performance indicator, Coordination, Manufacturing equipment, Evaluation

Abstract: Manufacturing equipment takes the task of operation and directly effects on the manufacturing process. One single Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is mainly employed to evaluate equipment inmost studies, neither integrating the KPIs into a completed evaluation system nor considering the impact and conflict among KPIs. In this paper, a KPI evaluation architecture is presented to define and analyze KPIs, and then a common structure for KPI to obtain the KPI set of manufacturing equipment is introduced. An available multi-KPI coordination model is proposed to discern and balance the relationship amongmulti-KPI. Finally, a case study is introduced to illustrate the applicability of the coordination model by using multi-objective optimization strategy and an efficient solution is obtained.

Key words: Key performance indicator, Coordination, Manufacturing equipment, Evaluation

Li Zhu, Hongye Su, Shan Lu, YueWang, Quanling Zhang. Coordinating and Evaluating of Multiple Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Equipment: Case Study of Distillation Column[J]. , 2014, 22(7): 805-811.

参考文献

[1] O. Ljungberg, Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 18 (5) (1998) 495-507.
[2] F. Yacoub, J.F. MacGregor, Analysis of equipment performance in processes with complex serial-parallel structures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 (2009) 7181-7185.
[3] K.S. Chen, M.L. Huang, P.L. Chang, Performance evaluation on manufacturing times, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 31 (2006) 335-341.
[4] Z.Q. Geng, Y.M. Han, X.B. Gu, Q.X. Zhu, Energy efficiency estimation based on data fusion strategy: case study of ethylene product industry, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (25) (2012) 8526-8534.
[5] Q.H. Shen, H.Y. Su, L. Zhu, S. Lu, Benchmark determination for key performance indicators of manufacturing equipment, CIESC J. 63 (9) (2012) 2958-2964.
[6] M.A. Younes, M. Shahtout, M.N. Damir, A parameters design approach to improve product quality and equipment performance in hot rolling, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 171 (2006) 83-92.
[7] A.S. Irshad, Y. Jamil, K.M. Rauf, A.M. Syed, Evaluation of performance inmanufacturing organization through productivity and quality, Afr. J.Bus. Manag. 5 (6) (2011) 2211-2219.
[8] J.A. Garza-Reyes, S. Eldridge, K.D. Barber, H. Soriano-Meier, Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and process capability (PC) measures, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 27 (1) (2010) 48-62.
[9] C.C. Yuen, S.K. Aatmeeyata Gupta, A.K. Ray, Multi-objective optimization of membrane separation modules using genetic algorithm, J. Membr. Sci. 176 (2000) 177-196.
[10] ISO/DIS 22400-2. “Automation systems and integration—key performance indicators for manufacturing operations management-Part 2: Definitions and descriptions”.
[11] L. Zhu, H.Y. Su, Q.H. Shen, Evaluation architecture of manufacturing execution system based on key performance indicators in process industry, Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 18 (12) (2012) 2643-2649.
[12] S.Q. Wang, L.K. Dai, L. Yu, Process Control Engineering, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, 2008. (in Chinese).
[13] T. Tosukhowong, Dynamic Real-time Optimization and Control of an Integrated Plant, Ph. D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Notrh Avenue, 2006.
[14] Y. Shi, Chemical Engineering Manual, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, 1996. (in Chinese).
[15] S.J. Li, H. Wang, F. Qian, Multi-objective genetic algorithm and its applications in chemical engineering, Comput. Appl. Chem. 20 (6) (2003) 755-760 (in Chinese).
[16] F. Xu, X.L. Luo, Margin analysis and control design of FCCU regenerator based on dynamic optimization (II) Solution and result analysis, CIESC J. 60 (3) (2009) 683-690.
[17] J.D. Schaffer,Multi-objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms, Proceedings of the International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and their Application, 1985, pp. 93-100, (Pittsburgh).
[18] C.A. Coello, G.T. Pulido, M.S. Lechuga, Handing multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8 (3) (2004) 256-279.
[19] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agrawal, et al., A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 (2) (2002) 182-197.
[20] C. Schweiger, Process Synthesis, Design, and Control: Optimization with Dynamic Models and Discrete Decisions, Princeton University, Princeton, 1999.
[21] S.J. Mu, H.Y. Su, Y. Gu, J. Chu, Multi-objective optimization of industrial purified terephthalic acid oxidation process, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 11 (5) (2003) 536-541.
[22] W.F. Hou, H.Y. Su, S.J. Mu, J. Chu, Multi-objective optimization of the industrial naphtha catalytic reforming process, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 15 (1) (2007) 75-80.
[23] Y.Q. Jiao, H.Y. Su, Z.W. Liao,W.F. Hou,Modeling and multi-objective optimization of refinery hydrogen network, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 19 (6) (2011) 990-998.

Coordinating and Evaluating of Multiple Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Equipment: Case Study of Distillation Column

Coordinating and Evaluating of Multiple Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Equipment: Case Study of Distillation Column

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	Jiacheng Chen, Jincheng Wang, Shuhong Li, Kailing Xiang, Shiqiang Song. Pyridine terminated polyurethane dendrimer/chlorinated butyl rubber nanocomposites with excellent mechanical and damping properties[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2023, 53(1): 211-221.
[2]	Xinqiang You, Kai Zhao, Ling Li, Ting Qiu. Ionic liquids as entrainer in extractive distillation for effectively separating 1-propanol–water azeotropic mixture[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2022, 49(9): 224-233.
[3]	Yuanyuan Jin, Siping Ding, Peiyun Li, Xuefen Wang. Coordination of thin-film nanofibrous composite dialysis membrane and reduced graphene oxide aerogel adsorbents for elimination of indoxyl sulfate[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2022, 49(9): 111-121.
[4]	Xin Pan, Jingjing Ma, Xiude Hu, Qingjie Guo. Energy and economic analysis of a hydrogen and ammonia co-generation system based on double chemical looping[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 36(8): 190-198.
[5]	Chen Chen, Qiong Tang, Hong Xu, Lei Liu, Mingxing Tang, Xuekuan Li, Jinxiang Dong. Alkylation of naphthalene with n-butene catalyzed by liquid coordination complexes and its lubricating properties[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 39(11): 306-313.
[6]	Shaobo Wang, Yunchao Zhao, Zeyu Zhang, Yalong Zhang, Linlin Li. Recent advances in amino acid-metal coordinated nanomaterials for biomedical applications[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2021, 38(10): 30-42.
[7]	Shuguang Xiang, Jiye Wang. Quantum chemical descriptors based QSAR modeling of neodymium carboxylate catalysts for coordination polymerization of isoprene[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2020, 28(7): 1805-1808.
[8]	Mengyao Li, Wenli Du, Feng Qian, Weiming Zhong. Total plant performance evaluation based on big data: Visualization analysis of TE process[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(8): 1736-1749.
[9]	Cong Qi, Maoni Liu, Guiqing Wang, Yuhang Pan, Lin Liang. Experimental research on stabilities, thermophysical properties and heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids in heat exchanger systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(12): 2420-2430.
[10]	Xiaolong Xu, Haihua He, Jia Zhao, Bailin Wang, Shanchuan Gu, Xiaonian Li. The ligand coordination approach for improving the stability of low-mercury catalyst in the hydrochlorination of acetylene[J]. , 2017, 25(9): 1217-1221.
[11]	Shixin Gong, Cheng Shao, Li Zhu. Energy efficiency evaluation based on DEA integrated factor analysis in ethylene production[J]. , 2017, 25(6): 793-799.
[12]	Xionglin Luo, Pengfei Cao, Feng Xu. Dynamic interaction analysis and pairing evaluation in control configuration design[J]. , 2016, 24(7): 861-868.
[13]	庞磊, 张奇. Influence of Vapor Cloud Shape on Temperature Field of Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion[J]. , 2010, 18(1): 164-169.
[14]	卢晓江, 刘世杰. 柱型水力旋流器筛分软木浆的评价[J]. , 2006, 14(4): 537-541.
[15]	刘天庆, 孙相玉. 添加剂强化沸腾传热的综合评价及预测[J]. , 2001, 9(1): 12-16.